New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

No-Pressure Diamond Scratchers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As the hardest substance known, diamond is ideal for cutting rock and other tough stuff. But diamond is costly, and it degrades when machining steel and other ferrous metals because of reactions that create softer iron carbides. For cutting steel, the first choice is cubic boron nitride, which is almost as hard, resisting 40 to 50 gigapascals (GPa) of pressure compared with diamond’s 70 to 100 GPa. But manufacturing the substance requires high temperatures (1,500 degrees Celsius) and extreme pressures (5 GPa), which make it expensive.

A low-pressure method may provide a less expensive route to ultrahard materials. “We wanted to design new hard materials, rather than finding them using trial-and-error methods,” says physical chemist Sarah Tolbert of the University of California, Los Angeles. The hardness of diamond and boron nitride arises because of short, covalent bonds that keep the constituent atoms strongly stuck together and rigid in all directions. certain “ultraincompressible” metals are rigid in two dimensions: they resist squeezing—the electrons inside them strongly repel one another—but they are relatively soft because their atoms are arranged in layers that can slide past one another. Tolbert and her colleagues found a way to harden these metals by introducing another element that covalently bonds to these layers, preventing them from slipping without disrupting incompressibility.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe