New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

No-Till Farming Is Even Better for Wildlife Than Thought

Some species adapt well to no-till fields

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As grassland has morphed into farmland across the American Midwest, wildlife diversity and abundance have declined. But for some birds things might not be so grim. Some grassland species appear to have adapted particularly well to no-till soybean fields, according to research published in March in the journal Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment.

Tilling is a process in which farmers remove weeds and loosen soil before seeding the ground, but no-till farming eschews that practice. Detritus from the previous season's harvest is left covering the ground, where it provides a nice foundation for nesting birds.

That birds were more likely to nest in no-till fields than in tilled ones was not terribly surprising. Rather it was “the extent that birds used no-till [fields], the species of birds we found nesting, and their nest success relative to what we consider quality habitat,” says Kelly R. VanBeek, who conducted the study for a master's thesis at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


James Herkert, director of the Office of Resource Conservation at the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, was also surprised by the species diversity in no-till fields, including several “that are of conservation interest such as eastern meadowlark, dickcissel [and] upland sandpiper.” American robin nests were the most common found in both field types, which was also unexpected because robins tend to prefer nesting in trees and shrubs. It “shows just how adaptable they are,” he says.

Nest loss was high in both types of fields, though. The birds whose nests were destroyed by machinery would have been spared if planting were delayed until June 1. But in the past 10 years farmers have planted, on average, 66 percent of soybeans by May 30, in part because soybeans have better yields if planted earlier.

The conflicting needs of farmers and wildlife “make finding win-win solutions challenging,” Herkert says. Still, the researchers suggest that rather than buying small tracts of land to set aside as wildlife reserves, conservationists should work with farmers to implement more ecologically sustainable strategies, such as no-till farming.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Where Farmers and Birds Agree” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 4 (), p. 26
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0414-26

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe