New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Nobel Prize–winning brain scientist steps down over Epstein ties

Richard Axel resigned from his post co-leading Columbia University’s Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute over his long ties to Jeffrey Epstein

Close-up of Richard Axel and Cornelia  standing in front of a Breakthrough Prize backdrop

Richard Axel and his wife, Cornelia Bargmann, in 2019.

Ian Tuttle/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On Tuesday Nobel Prize winner Richard Axel resigned as co-director Columbia University’s Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute over his decade-long association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A molecular biologist, Axel shared the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work revealing how the brain identifies odors.

“My past association with Jeffrey Epstein was a serious error in judgment, which I deeply regret,” Axel said in a statement. He also announced he would no longer be an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “I apologize for compromising the trust of my friends, students, and colleagues,” Axel said in the same statement.

Axel’s resignation came after the Columbia University student newspaper, the Columbia Spectator, reported earlier this month that Axel and his wife were invited to Epstein’s island in 2011—three years after the financier’s conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor—but that the scientist did not go.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Axel and Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, had a long, public friendship, with the scientist praising Epstein in a 2007 New York Magazine article. The name “richard axel” appears 933 times in the Department of Justice’s recently created Epstein file library. (Numerous people are mentioned in the files, and their appearance alone does not indicate any wrongdoing.)

Axel is among several high-profile scientists to have been connected to Epstein, who was known for cultivating close connections with academics and science media, including Scientific American. Axel has in the past written two articles for Scientific American; the most recent was published in 1995 and republished in 2006.

In a statement released on Tuesday, Columbia University said that “the University has seen no evidence that Dr. Axel violated any University policy or the law.” Axel will continue his research at the university, according to the statement. In response to Scientific American’s request for comment from Axel, a representative of Columbia cited the statements from him and the university.

Editor’s Note (2/25/26): This is a developing story and may be updated.

Dan Vergano was formerly senior editor, Washington, D.C., at Scientific American. He has previously written for Grid News, BuzzFeed News, National Geographic and USA Today. He is chair of the New Horizons committee for the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing and a journalism award judge for both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

More by Dan Vergano

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe