New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

North America May Be Dripping Away Deep under the Midwest

A long-lost slab of Earth’s crust may be pulling away the bottom of the oldest part of North America, scientists say

3-D illustration of a cross section of Earth's structure (Crust with a mountain, upper and lower mantle, outer and inner core) isolated on black

Victor Josan/Alamy Stock Photo

Something very strange appears to be happening deep, deep underneath the U.S. Midwest and the Ohio Valley.

North America’s geological core has persisted for more than a billion years; it’s what scientists call a craton, a massive block of continental rock that withstands the natural recycling system of plate tectonics. Typically scientists think of cratons as unchanging, nigh eternal. But research published in Nature Geoscience suggests that a long-lost geological plate may be siphoning molten rock from the underside of the North American craton and eroding it from below, right under our feet.

Such a scenario would not be unprecedented—scientists have evidence that the North China craton thinned dramatically millions of years ago—but it would certainly be surprising and intriguing to study in real time. “Cratons are the oldest cores of continents, so they have been sitting near Earth’s surface for billions of years,” says Claire Currie, a geophysicist at the University of Alberta, who was not involved in the new research. “They’ve persisted through time, so this is quite unusual.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The scientists behind the recent research had no intention of finding an eroding craton, according to study lead author Junlin Hua, a geophysicist at the University of Science and Technology of China. The team merely wanted to apply a new, more precise analysis technique to the data gathered by North America’s rich network of more than 6,000 seismometers, in the hope of seeing the continent in more detail than ever before.

The work relied on the seismometer network’s observations of more than 200 earthquakes, each of which produced multiple types of seismic waves. These waves are affected in specific ways by changes in the material they pass through—for example, there are distinctive effects when that material is particularly cold or warm or is strong or weak. By analyzing the waves, scientists can reverse engineer a map of Earth’s innards, Hua says. And the researchers sought to conduct this work in a way that would account for every wiggle in the trove of seismic data, a laborious process.

Seismic velocity map of North America. This map shows seismic speed in the Earth’s crust at 200 kilometers depth across the continental United States and portions of Central America and Canada. The North American craton (outlined in black dashes) has a high seismic velocity compared to its surroundings

A map produced by the authors of a new study in Nature Geoscience shows the relative seismic velocity of material that is 200 kilometers below Earth’s surface and located around the base of the North American craton. Cratons are characterized by high seismic velocity. On this map, blue represents rock through which seismic waves travel faster; red represents rock through which seismic waves travel more slowly. The black dashed line outlines the borders of the North American craton.

“Seismic Full-Waveform Tomography of Active Cratonic Thinning beneath North America Consistent with Slab-Induced Dripping,” by Junlin Hua et al., Nature Geoscience, Vol. 18. Published online March 28, 2025.

It was months into the analysis when Hua started to recognize that the investigation was turning up something surprising. The craton itself looked normal enough: a slab of dense rock, about 200 kilometers thick, through which seismic waves traveled relatively fast—what scientists refer to as high-seismic-velocity material—that abruptly transitioned to material with lower seismic velocity as the craton gave way to younger rock.

But below part of the craton, underneath much of the Midwest and the Ohio Valley, something strange was happening. Here a patchy pattern of molten material with that same high seismic velocity sagged to a depth of nearly 600 kilometers, almost to the lower mantle. Those measurements, Hua says, suggest that in this area North America’s craton is dripping downward into the mantle in a way he and his colleagues didn’t expect and couldn’t quite explain.

What got them unstuck was considering a relic of geological history that lies hidden under North America: remains of the Farallon plate, an oceanic plate that stretched between the Pacific and North American plates some 100 million years ago, when the dinosaurs were at their peak. Most of the Farallon plate was eventually shoved under North America. Its remnants linger in the lower mantle, some 800 kilometers below Earth’s surface, and indeed showed up in the cross sections of seismic velocities that Hua and his colleagues made.

A cross-section of the continental crust and mantle highlights how the Farallon plate is sinking through the lower mantle and shows the cratonic material dripping down through a relatively narrow area

ELabArts; Source: “Seismic Full-Waveform Tomography of Active Cratonic Thinning beneath North America Consistent with Slab-Induced Dripping,” by Junlin Hua et al., in Nature Geoscience, Vol. 18; April 2025 (reference)

When the scientists used computer modeling to test theories of what could pull cratonic material downward, the Farallon slab was key: drips formed only when the slab was incorporated into the model. Hua calls the slab “a big sinker” that pulls material off the craton and down into Earth.

Right now, Currie says, this is just a hypothesis—but one that she calls “intriguing.” Currie would like to see other signals of the cratonic drip—for example, is the surface of Earth being pulled down at all over this region? She would also like to see stronger explanations for how the craton gets drawn down into material denser than it is; it ought to float above such material.

Still, the research is a surprising glimpse of activity in an environment that scientists have long considered unchanging, Hua says. “The continent is not something static,” he says. “It has a dynamic component.”

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels
Scientific American Magazine Vol 333 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Midwestern Melt” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 333 No. 2 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092025-V5UwcxgsRjM8AtsMysjrH

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe