New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Obamacare Calorie Count Rules Ushered In

Menu label requirements go into effect Monday

President Donald Trump has found one part of the federal health law palatable: He’s allowing Obamacare rules that require chain restaurants to post calorie counts to go into effect Monday.

The rules, which are among the final pieces of the 2010 Affordable Care Act to be implemented, require restaurants to list calories on all menus and menu boards. Restaurants will also have to provide on-site additional nutritional information, such as fat and sodium levels.

The law, intended to nudge Americans to eat healthier, applies to chains with at least 20 stores.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And it won’t be just fast-food and sit-down restaurants that are affected. Grocers, convenience stores, movie theaters, pizza delivery companies and even vending machines must meet the new requirements.

The menu labeling rules will improve public health, the Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said last week in an interview. He pointed to studies showing that enlightened customers order, on average, up to 50 fewer calories a day.

While that equates to the calories in a small cookie, Gottlieb said, the impact compounded over weeks and months can deliver a large benefit.

“This is a meaningful, incremental step in addressing” the country’s obesity epidemic, he said.

Seeking to alleviate retailers’ concerns, the FDA delayed implementing the rules several times to give the food industry time to comply after finalizing the menu-labeling rule in 2013.

The provisions are supported by consumer advocates and the National Restaurant Association, which wanted to avoid catering to a hodgepodge of requirements from cities and states.

But some food industry groups and retailers say they still don’t have all the answers and worry the rules will place an undue burden on shop owners.

The National Association of Convenience Stores expressed reservations about how its members will comply.

“Convenience retailers will welcome any flexibility the FDA may be able to provide in order to comply with this onerous rule,” said spokesman Jon Taets.

Conservatives in Congress also have repeatedly lashed out at the provisions, with the House passing a bill earlier this year that would modify them. The Senate has not acted on that legislation.

Even as the provisions go into effect, the FDA announced that over the course of the next year officials will seek to educate the industry about meeting the new rules, rather than enforcing them.

Many restaurant chains, including McDonald’s, Burger King, Taco Bell and Panera Bread, have listed calorie information for years. But some, including Legal Sea Foods and the Melting Pot, have not yet added the information. Officials for the Melting Pot said they plan to have nutritional information posted by the end of the month. Legal Sea Foods did not return calls for comment.

“Americans deserve to know what they’re getting when ordering for themselves and their families at chain restaurants, supermarkets and other food retailers,” said Margo Wootan, vice president for nutrition for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group. “Menu labeling isn’t a silver bullet. It’s just one of dozens of things we should be doing to help Americans maintain a healthy weight and reduce their risk of diet-related health problems like diabetes, heart disease and cancer.”

But others see the issue differently.

Daren Bakst, a fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation, said the law equates to government overreach.

“It’s not up to the government to influence what people eat — that should be left up to each individual,” he said.

Bakst said he likes having nutritional information on foods he buys but opposes the government mandate for retailers.

“Plenty of restaurants will be hurt by compliance costs,” he said.

Yet many restaurants say they are ready.

“This date is long overdue,” said Cicely Simpson, an executive vice president at the National Restaurant Association. Most chains don’t see the calorie information postings as hurting overall sales. Yet, she said, the information will lead some consumers to switch the foods they choose.

She said the FDA has been flexible with the industry, including efforts to clarify that promotional signs and flyers in stores are not the same as menus and don’t have to include calorie information.

Domino’s Pizza spokesman Tim McIntyre said his company has concerns about how its franchises will meet these requirements but is confident the changes won’t increase prices for consumers.

The pizza delivery company hopes the FDA will allow it to meet the provisions by posting nutritional information on its website as it has done for years, rather than on menu boards, he said. The company said 90 percent of orders are placed by phone or internet, and with hundreds of pizza combinations and sizes it would be difficult to list nutritional info for each one on a menu.

McIntyre said the menu labeling rules were meant to give consumers calorie information at the point where they are ordering. For pizza delivery companies that is rarely inside the store, he noted.

“All we are asking for is common-sense approach to put this information where people are … and we believe the internet is where people are going to go to get this information,” he said. The FDA has put out thousands of pages of guidance to help restaurants and other food providers comply with the law, such as helping grocery stores decide where to put information on salad bars. Under FDA guidance, if pizza delivery stores don’t have menu boards, they don’t have to add any under the law.

Gottlieb said he frequently uses restaurant’s calorie information on signs when ordering food. “I admittedly occasionally go to fast-food restaurants and take into consideration the calories,” he said. “I used to go to McDonald’s time to time to order an Egg McMuffin, but now I go for the Egg White Delight.”

According to McDonald’s, an Egg McMuffin packs 300 calories while the Egg White Delight has only 280.

This story was originally published by Kaiser Health News on May 7, 2018. Read the original story here.

Phil Galewitz is a senior correspondent at KHN who covers Medicaid, Medicare, long-term care, hospitals and various state health issues.

More by Phil Galewitz

KFF Health News, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF -- the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

More by KFF Health News

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe