New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Obstetricians oppose CDC to recommend more shots for moms

In a first, the American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists released its own vaccine schedule

A pregnant woman with a bandaid on her shoulder.

aire images/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A coalition of maternal health groups on Wednesday recommended four shots for pregnant people, including COVID and flu immunizations. The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) immunization schedule, endorsed by 13 other medical organizations, goes beyond what’s recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which leaves out a universal recommendation for a COVID shot.

“Maternal vaccines are one of the most effective ways to protect not only the mother but her newborn as well,” said Andrew Racine, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), in a statement on the recommendations. Babies with a still-developing immune system depend on adults getting vaccinated to prevent the child’s infection with dangerous illnesses, he said. The AAP was one of the organizations that endorsed the ACOG recommendations; others include the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

The CDC withdrew its recommendation that all pregnant people get a COVID vaccine in 2025. And it only recommends a flu shot during flu season, not any time of the year and in any trimester, as the ACOG recommendations do.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Overall, the ACOG schedule calls for the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis) shot between 27 and 36 weeks of pregnancy and the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot from weeks 32 to 36 during a first pregnancy. Pregnant people with risk factors may need pneumococcal, meningococcal and hepatitis shots as well, the group advises. Three other vaccinations—those against human papillomavirus, measles, mumps and rubella, and chickenpox—should be received before or after pregnancy, including while breastfeeding, according to the recommendations.

The ACOG immunization schedule comes as a survey released by Harvard University and the de Beaumont Foundation on Tuesday finds that only 12 percent of Americans say they trust CDC recommendations “a great deal.” Outside medical groups, on the other hand, such as the American Heart Association, were trusted “somewhat” or “a great deal” by 80 percent of survey respondents.

“Changing national recommendations coupled with rampant vaccine misinformation are resulting in confusion for both patients and health care professionals,” said ACOG president Camille A. Clare in the statement announcing the recommendations. “It is incredibly important for the public to have access to reliable, evidence-based information on maternal immunizations from a trusted source.”

Editor’s Note (6/11/26): This story is in development and may be updated.

Dan Vergano was formerly senior editor, Washington, D.C., at Scientific American. He has previously written for Grid News, BuzzFeed News, National Geographic and USA Today. He is chair of the New Horizons committee for the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing and a journalism award judge for both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

More by Dan Vergano

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe