Octopus Arm Has a Mind of Its Own

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: ©SCIENCE

When it comes to flexibility, even the most limber among us can't begin to compare with the octopus. Joints like the shoulder, elbow and wrist limit maneuverability in humans and other creatures with articulated appendages. The octopus, in contrast, lacks joints. As a result, its arms possess virtually limitless freedom of movement. Such flexible arms require especially complex control, however. New research suggests that to meet those demands, the octopus allocates some of that motor control to neural circuitry embedded in the arms themselves, instead of relying on the brain alone. The findings appear today in the journal Science.

When an octopus reaches for something, it does so in a highly stereotypical and invariant way, unfurling its arm such that a bend propagates along the arm toward the tip (see images at right). Binyamin Hochner of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and colleagues tested octopuses whose arm-brain connection had been severed and found that they could elicit the characteristic arm movement by stimulating the arms mechanically or electrically.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Based on these observations, the researchers conclude that the octopus arm contains an independent peripheral nervous system. If so, it may well be that the brain governs the general direction of planned arm movement and the peripheral system handles the details. It is this division of neural labor and the use of highly stereotypical movements, they assert, that allow the octopus to maintain control over its exceptionally flexible appendages.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe