New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

AI-designed experiments run by robots hint at a new approach to biology

Researchers at OpenAI and Ginkgo Bioworks showed that an AI model working with an autonomous lab can design and iterate real biology experiments at unprecedented speed

Technicians in white lab coats walk through a bright, modern robotic laboratory with rows of automated machines and enclosed workstations used for scientific processes.

Technicians move through Ginkgo Bioworks’ automated, robot-run lab, where machines handle high-volume biological research and testing.

Gingko Bioworks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

OpenAI’s GPT can summarize research papers and make predictions—but can it do science? Can it generate hypotheses, design experiments, interpret results and iterate? Last summer researchers at OpenAI and Ginkgo Bioworks, a company that designs and installs autonomous, robot-run labs, decided to find out.

Though artificial intelligence systems have posted high scores in math, physics and computer science, biology is harder to measure, says Joy Jiao, who leads life sciences research at OpenAI. “For something like ‘design the optimal experiment,’ there’s no right answer. It’s what we call a hard-hard problem: it’s hard to generate a solution, and it’s also really hard to verify.” That led the team to have AI design experiments using superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP), an engineered jellyfish protein that is a common benchmark because it provides a fast, unambiguous signal: it glows green.

While OpenAI’s GPT-5 provided the experimental designs, Ginkgo Bioworks provided what its co-founder and CEO Jason Kelly calls the “Waymo” of biology: an automated lab system where researchers set objective and the AI does the driving. The autonomous robotic lab can rapidly process experiments and operate without constant human oversight.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team focused its experiment on cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS), a technique for producing proteins without living cells. Traditional biomanufacturing relies on genetically modifying living cells to produce medicines like insulin. CFPS makes proteins outside of cells by running the cell’s own protein-making machinery in a controlled mixture.

“It is one of the fastest ways to make proteins,” says Reshma Shetty, chief operating officer and co-founder of Ginkgo Bioworks. “You don’t need to clone your DNA, put it into the cell and wait for the cell to grow up.” Improving CFPS could have significant implications for medicine, food and agricultural products.

From OpenAI’s San Francisco, Calif., headquarters, GPT-5 designed experiments and sent them across the country to Ginkgo Bioworks’ robotic systems in Boston. As it iterated, GPT-5 analyzed incoming data and proposed new experiments, which took about an hour per cycle. “In the time it would take for a human to get their coffee, sit down at their computer, log in and get all set up to do work, the model could take in the data, analyze it and propose new experiments,” Shetty says.

“At the beginning of this project, I didn’t know if we could design a single experiment,” Jiao says. “I can remember when the experimental results came back, the reaction from both sides was like, oh, we made a non-zero amount of protein—and that was somewhat surprising.”

After two months and more than 36,000 tests of unique reaction compositions, the AI-driven system reduced the cost of producing the protein by about 40 percent compared with a previously reported benchmark from bioengineer Michael Jewett’s lab at Stanford University. “Honestly, it’s a pretty big deal,” says Jewett, whose lab published its own benchmark paper last week in Nature Communications. “How do we develop medicines faster to get lifesaving therapeutics to patients sooner? I think the integration of artificial intelligence and autonomous labs is one way to do that.”

The OpenAI–Ginkgo Bioworks collaboration also produced one moment of unexpected novelty. When the team gave GPT-5 access to new reagents, “it tried to squeeze in as many as it possibly could,” Jiao says. “So what the model did was set the amount of water to something negative.” Starting an experiment with a negative volume of water isn’t possible. At the lab, when Ginkgo Bioworks’ robot technicians saw the problem, they ran the experiments anyway at a slightly larger overall volume than specified.

The AI-improved reaction composition is now commercially available. More importantly, on March 2, Ginkgo Bioworks launched its Ginkgo Cloud Lab, which allows researchers anywhere to submit experiments to autonomous lab systems starting at just $39 per run. Meanwhile the U.S. Department of Energy is funding a 97-robot autonomous lab at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington State. The lab will be built by Ginkgo Bioworks and is scheduled to become operational by 2030. “[AI] models alone are not going to cut it,” Shetty says. “You need models paired with labs that can do the experimental validation.”

Deni Ellis Béchard was formerly Scientific American’s senior writer for technology. He is author of 10 books and has received a Commonwealth Writers’ Prize, a Midwest Book Award and a Nautilus Book Award for investigative journalism. He holds two master’s degrees in literature, as well as a master’s degree in biology from Harvard University. His most recent novel, We Are Dreams in the Eternal Machine, explores the ways that artificial intelligence could transform humanity. You can follow him on X, Instagram and Bluesky @denibechard

More by Deni Ellis Béchard

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe