New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Orion’s Twin Rogue Planets Inexplicably Blaze with Intense Radio Waves

Researchers don’t know how this pair of free-floating planets formed or why it radiates so brightly

Part of the Orion Nebula shown in infrared

Part of the Orion Nebula shown in infrared.

NASA, ESA, CSA/Science leads and image processing: M. McCaughrean, S. Pearson (CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Strange, twirling duos of roughly Jupiter-size celestial bodies in the Orion Nebula have had astronomers scratching their heads since the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) photographed them in October 2023. Unless they were violently ejected from a solar system—unlikely, given their delicate, undisturbed dance—the free-floating pairs challenge astronomers’ long-standing notion that planets can form only within a star’s orbit.

Researchers have now discovered radio-wavelength signals from one of these 42so-called Jupiter-mass binary objects (JuMBOs), according to a study in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, suggesting the pair is astoundingly bright. “It’s important to understand what these objects are, and having radio data really adds a new dimension to the problem,” says the study’s lead author, Luis F. Rodríguez, an astronomer at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

When Rodríguez and his team heard about JWST’s discovery, they scoured public telescope data for unidentified radio-wave sources in Orion and found one that recurred three times over a decade in the exact same position as the pair known as JuMBO24. The signals suggest JuMBO24 isn’t moving quickly through the nebula, which would mean it might have indeed been born alone rather than blasted away from a star system.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The Orion Nebula is just so far away that I would never have expected there to be detectable radio emission,” says Melodie Kao, a planetary radio expert at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not part of the team. Large planets’ magnetic fields can capture electrons, building up a carousel of electricity that zips around their equators and beams out radio waves like an antenna. But it would take unprecedented power for JuMBO24’s signal to reach Earth. “This JuMBO would have to be extraordinarily bright—100 times brighter than anything we’ve ever seen,” Kao says. If confirmed, this attribute would make JuMBOs even more baffling because no ordinary planet’s magnetic field can sustain such a dazzling glow.

“I don’t think the last word has been spoken on this, but it’s a really intriguing paper,” says Jan Forbrich, an astronomer at the University of Hertfordshire in England. Forbrich was not involved in this study, but his 2012 discovery of the then unidentified radio source in Orion made it possible. Both he and Kao hope to see further radio surveys of this and other JuMBOs to confirm their status as powerful radio sources.

Rodríguez agrees that more radio telescopes should tune in to Orion’s station. He says JuMBOs may add to our understanding of where planets come from and how many there are. If such pairs can really form without a host star, he says, “it means there are probably a zillion planets in our own galaxy that we haven’t accounted for.”

Joseph Howlett is a senior reporter at Scientific American covering physics, math, astronomy, and more. He was previously a math staff writer at Quanta Magazine and holds a Ph.D. in particle physics from Columbia University.

More by Joseph Howlett
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Tuning In” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 4 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0424-18

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe