Patent Extensions and Lobbyists in Congress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

We would call the attention of our readers to an article on another page, copied from the New York Herald of the 23d inst., concerning the movements of some of our wealthiest patentees to get their patents extended by Congress. Most of the applicants were refused extensions on application at the Patent Office, for the reason that they could not show that they had not already reaped a rich reward from their patents. Others have unsuccessfully besieged Congress, session after session, until their patents have long since expired, and now they have the audacity to ask Congress to renew them. Where are the Woodworth assignees ? Why are they not on hand to see if they cannot get Congress to revive the Planing Machine monopoly ? We shall watch these Congress vampires and the lobbyists they employ to operate the wires for them, and shall make a note from time to time of what is going on at the Capitol. We shall also have something to say on the new Patent bill, just presented by Mr. Taylor, M. C. of Brooklyn, N. Y., as soon as it is printed, giving an account of its origin, and pointing out some of its peculiarities.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American