Patent Office Report for 1857

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If an apology were needed for our again approaching the subject of the Patent Office Report distribution, we might refer our readers to the fact that our journal being regarded by inventors as the special advocate and defender of their interests and rights, we are ever watchful and zealous to guard them against such legislative encroachments as the one covered under the resolution reported from the Joint Committee on Printing, and passed by the House of Representatives on the 28th of last month. This resolution provides for the printing of twenty thousand extra copies of the mechanical portion of the Patent Office Report for the year 1857, for the use of the members of the present House of Representatives only, being a reduction of the number printed of the preceding year's report of forty thousand. It is not our purpose at this time to object to this retrenchment movement in the reduction of the number, but simply to protest against the exclusive character of the distribution. We certainly think that the Patent Office, which may be regarded as the source to which all inventors look for information, and which may be said to be in direct communication with inventors, scientific societies, and others interested in these reports, should have been allotted at least one-half the number printed, believing as we do, that they would be more generally and properly distributed than when left exclusively in the hands of Members of Congress. It is a well-known fact that there are thousands of valuable works, including many of the Patent Office Reports of preceding years, now stored away in Washington, and other parts of the country, which were printed by Congress, and allotted to members of both Houses for distribution among those of their constituents likely to be benefited by their possession. Many others have been destroyed or sold for waste paper, or devoted to other comparatively useless purposes. The constituencies of Members of Congress are generally extended over a large space of country, and are included in villages, towns, and localities where the member has no personal acquaintance, and hence it follows that many of the persons for whom documents printed by Congress are specially designed, fail to receive or be benefited by them ; and their limited distribution is almost exclusively confined to the locality in which the member resides. We are sorfy that the extra number of the Report For 1857 was not divided for distribution equally between the members on the one part, and the Commissioner of Patents on the other. We think our readers will agree with us that under such a division a more faithful and equal distribution of them over the country would have taken place than will be effected by confining this task exclusively to Members of Congress, many of whom will distribute but few, except when a special demand is made upon them.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 36This article was published with the title “Patent Office Report for 1857” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 36 (), p. 285
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05151858-285

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe