New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Patent Watch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When 3-D movies returned to theaters five years ago with the opening of Chicken Little,they came with new specs. The old 3-D glasses that relied on red/cyan lenses went the way of Godzilla. Instead the new eye gear used a variety of more sophisticated methods to bring a sharp, full-color, three-dimensional image to viewers’ eyes without limiting the spectrum of colors they could see. Dolby, one of the major players in the 3-D movie market, just received a patent for its glasses, which offers a close-up look at how they work.

The Dolby glasses (Patent No. 7,784,938) rely on a phenomenon called spectral separation. A projector breaks up each of the three primary colors into multiple spectra and beams two different images—one meant for the left eye, one meant for the right eye—to the screen in rapid succession, one right after the other. (The images are projected at a rate of 144 frames per second, so you don't notice the trick.) Multilayer filters on Dolby's glasses allow the left eye to see shorter wavelength bands of blue, green and red than the right eye. “Both eyes get a full spectrum of color, but it's not the exact same frequency that the other eye is getting,” says Martin Richards, a principal staff engineer in Dolby's image technology group. The filters in each lens are made up of 70 to 80 layers of titanium oxide or silicon oxide, each with a different index of refraction; they either reflect or allow light to pass through, depending on its wavelength.

Dolby designed its glasses with curved lenses to correct for cross talk (when the right eye's image leaks into the left eye's field of vision), color shift, and reflections at the edge of the field of view. It also allows for light to hit the glasses from any angle without distortion. The actual glasses are not as bug-eyed as in the original sketch and come enclosed in black frames.

Anna Kuchment is a contributing editor at Scientific American and a staff science reporter at the Dallas Morning News. She is also co-author of a forthcoming book about earthquakes triggered by energy production.

More by Anna Kuchment
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Patent watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 5 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1110-30b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe