New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Patent Watch

Airborne power station

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Airborne power station: As a longtime resident of Seattle, Boeing engineer Brian J. Tillotson had often gazed up at the clouds and wondered how anyone living in such a sun-deprived place could ever hope to take advan­tage of solar power, the main offering of Boeing subsidiary Spectrolab. More than three years ago he came up with the answer: Why not build a power station above the clouds?

The idea, described in Patent No. 8,006,933 B2, has applications even in the brightest of locales. Between 20 to 30 percent of the sun’s power is lost in the earth’s lower atmosphere before you begin to account for unwanted haze or clouds. That is a technical challenge for Spectrolab, which makes efficient solar cells by using reflectors to amplify high concentrations of sunlight 400- to 800-fold. Spectrolab’s cells are used most often to power satellites orbiting far above the atmos­phere, which renders the problem moot. In 2008, however, Tillotson began looking for a way to adapt them for use by U.S. troops stationed in remote parts of Afghanistan, where security concerns requiring expensive convoys had driven the cost of delivering fuel to power diesel gen­erators to as high as $700 a gallon.

A floating power station, he realized, could solve that problem—and bring solar power to downtown Seattle, too. “You would only have to go up a few thousand feet to get quite a bit of benefit,” he notes. Tillotson envisions solar cells attached to an airship or dirigible, which would drop thousands of feet of lightweight trans­mis­sion cable down to a mooring. The U.S. Army is already experimenting with battlefield-surveil­lance dirigibles that get their power from the ground via cables. Boeing’s device would be similar, except power would move down.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Boeing has not yet built a prototype, Tillotson says, because engineers are “hoping to see some technological improvements that would make the floating power station a little more afford­able.” At the moment, dirigibles demand inten­sive upkeep. Helium must be replenished as often as once a week and repairs made regularly to their outer shell, which is battered by wind and weather. “It turns out, operationally, airships aren’t as simple as I like to imagine—at least the ones being used by the army,” he says. Over time, Tillotson observes, better sealant and material for the shell or hull will improve the economics by avoiding leaks when the dirigible gets knocked around.

Adam Piore is a freelance journalist. His last article for Scientific American examined the movement to bring evolution back to the classroom.

More by Adam Piore
Scientific American Magazine Vol 306 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Patent Watch” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 306 No. 1 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012012-5C6hjiUJwJloZDv8O1PzEQ

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe