New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Plant Absorbs Toxic RDX Contamination

Modified switchgrass can sop up weapons chemicals on military ranges

Switchgrass cleaner concept.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Chemicals from munitions have permeated soil across an estimated 10 million hectares of land used for firing ranges across the U.S. One such chemical, an explosive called RDX, can leach into groundwater and cause seizures and possibly cancer. Now a study in Nature Biotechnology shows that genetically modified switchgrass—a plant common in North American prairies—can absorb and break down RDX.

University of York biologists Neil Bruce and Liz Rylott and their colleagues altered a switchgrass variety to carry two genes from a bacterium that produces enzymes capable of reducing RDX into harmless components. After conducting lab tests, the researchers planted the modified switchgrass on New York State's RDX-polluted Fort Drum military base.

For three years the team tested soil and water pumped from plastic-lined plots where modified plants, wild plants or no plants grew, painstakingly removing seeds from the modified switchgrasses to prevent cross-pollination with local varieties. They found that the modified plants took up RDX, lowering levels significantly in the surrounding water, and broke it down—RDX did not appear in the modified plants' tissues, but it did in wild plants.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The evidence is compelling that the transgenic [switchgrass] works very well and grows without the RDX being toxic to the plant,” says University of Iowa environmental engineer Jerald Schnoor, who was not involved in the study.

Removing this pollutant has proved especially challenging, partly because unexploded ordnance peppers many of the country's massive firing ranges. Bacteria that break down RDX exist in soil but do not consume the toxin fast enough to keep it from seeping into aquifers.

“Nature has the ability to clean [RDX] up; sometimes it needs a bit of help,” Rylott says. “It's a Batman and Robin combo—bacterial Batman, and the plant is Robin.” Other researchers have used plants to clean up PCBs, DDT, nickel and arsenic.*

The researchers also genetically modified another plant, western wheatgrass, to take up RDX. “If we transform a couple more species,” Rylott says, “we can get a toolbox that will be able to take out RDX, but we can also maintain biodiversity across the training range.”

*Editor’s Note (8/10/21): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the reference to PCBs.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe