New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Plants That Lived on Mount Everest Rediscovered in Forgotten Lab Collection  

The specimens, which went unstudied for nearly seven decades, show adaptations to high elevation

Dan Rafla Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The upper slopes of Mount Everest are a punishing place for plant life: high levels of ultraviolet radiation scorch the mountain, temperatures regularly fall below freezing, and the icy, rocky terrain can hardly be called good soil. But now scientists have identified three new plant species capable of surviving this kind of place. Among the highest-elevation plants known to science, the specimens—collected decades ago but never studied until now—reveal unique adaptations to life on the roof of the world.

On May 25, 1952, a Swiss expedition gathered three plant samples on Everest at roughly 6,400 meters. (The summit, which was first reached the following year, is 8,848 meters.) The dried specimens were placed in an herbarium in Geneva and sat forgotten until 2017, when Cédric Dentant, a botanist at Écrins National Park in Gap, France, rediscovered them.

Dentant carefully analyzed the plants—each no more than a few centimeters long—and found several attributes that most likely contributed to their survival in such harsh surroundings, he reported in October in Alpine Botany. One of the plants had stems that burrowed into the ground, anchoring it in the unstable terrain; another had a cushionlike shape that limited heat and water loss; and two, according to notes made by the 1952 mountaineering team, grew in rock crevices, which are heated by sunlight and are often warmer than the surrounding alpine environment. “We're facing the limit of life,” Dentant says, referring to the extreme conditions in which these plants grew.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists nearly missed out on studying these high-altitude plants, says Sonja Wipf, an alpine plant ecologist at the WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF in Davos, Switzerland. “Not because they were growing on inaccessible rocky ledges,” says Wipf, who was not involved in the new research, “but because they were ‘buried’ in an herbarium.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe