New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Plastic-Wrap iPads

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have been trying for years to develop flexible electronic displays, a breakthrough that would bring us tablet computers that fold and roll up and clothing with stretchable video screens embedded in the fabric. The biggest problem has always been finding a malleable, ultrathin base layer, or substrate, on which to build the display. Polymer LEDs (PLEDs)—a form of the organic light-emitting-diode displays now going into extravagantly expensive, vanishingly thin televisions—are mere microns thick and pliable. The problem is that they have always needed to be manufactured on a plastic or glass substrate, which is usually somewhere between 1,000 and 10,000 times thicker than the PLED itself and not particularly flexible.

By changing the method of manufacture, however, it is possible to get rid of those thick, inflexible substrates. Using a “peel-and-stick” technique, an international team of scientists made PLEDs just two microns thick—several times thinner than plastic kitchen wrap.

First, the researchers apply a 1.4-micron-thick sheet of Mylar film, which will serve as the substrate for the PLED, to a rigid glass support. The Mylar sheet is similar to the screen protector that today comes on most new, out-of-the-box smartphones and tablet computers, says researcher Matthew White, a materials scientist at Johannes Kepler University in Linz, Austria. “We just realized that we could apply the [peel-and-stick] method to device fabrication and push the limits of how thin you can make the substrate.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once the Mylar film is in place, White and his colleagues deposit the PLED on top. The PLED has three layers: a 100-nanometer metal electrode, a 200-nanometer transparent electrode, and a light-emitting layer 225 to 330 nanometers thick sandwiched in between. When those elements are on the Mylar, the researchers peel the entire thing off the glass. The resulting display is as light, flexible and crushable as one would expect kitchen wrap to be.

Depositing the PLED elements on a thin, rubbery base layer makes a screen that is stretchable. The stretchiness is, theoretically, only limited by the stretchiness of the base layer.

This past summer the scientists fabricated two pliable, eight-pixel PLED displays, one that glows red and one that glows orange. Each pixel measures three by six millimeters, much larger than the tiny pixels in today's high-resolution screens. The PLEDs are nearly display-quality in brightness, however, and the researchers are confident they can shrink the pixel size readily.

Plenty of hurdles remain before these displays are ready for the market. The biggest: the metal electrodes are unstable in air; in about an hour the pixels gradually go dark. Different materials will be needed before the technology is ready for prime time. The displays are not particularly energy-efficient, either, although White says his team sees a clear path toward making them as efficient as conventional lighting.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Flexible, stretchable screens could put a rolled-up tablet in your pocket” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 48
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-48a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe