New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Plight of the Long-Distance Flyers

Individual countries may protect migratory birds but the great length of their journeys are endangered

©iStock.com

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cerulean warbler breeds in the mountains of West Virginia and Tennessee but winters far to the south in places like Venezuela and Colombia. Mining in the U.S. and the growth of coffee and cocoa plantations in South America are stripping away its habitats. All in all, 91 percent of 1,451 species of migratory birds are losing lands essential to their annual journeys, researchers report in today’s issue of Science magazine. It is not a problem that can be solved by one country. For example, Germany protects adequate land for 98 percent of its migrant birds but fewer than 13 percent of those species are protected across their global ranges. Roll your mouse over the highlighted countries on this map to see some key differences between countrywide protection and entire global routes.

The U.S. does poorly all on its own, decently protecting habitat for just over 22 percent of migrant birds within its borders. The fragmented nature of protection does not bode well for the endangered Far Eastern curlew, which journeys each year from Siberia to Australia and is losing essential stopovers around the Yellow Sea. Coordinated international action is needed but hard to bring about, the scientists say.

Josh Fischman was formerly senior editor for special projects at Scientific American and covered medicine, biology and science policy. He has written and edited about science and health for Discover, ScienceEarth and U.S. News & World Report. Follow Fischman on Bluesky @jfischman.bsky.social

More by Josh Fischman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe