New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

What Would Make You Buy a Smartwatch?

Brilliant crowdsourced ideas that just might make these new tech accessories worth it

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As I wrote in my Scientific American column this month, the early smartwatches aren't exactly flying off store shelves. Clearly, something's wrong—with the design, the price, the features or the concept itself. Or all of the above.

Maybe, therefore, someone should poll the public. Someone should ask them what features a smartwatch should have.

That's exactly what I did. I asked my Twitter followers (I'm @pogue) a simple question: "The first smartwatches don't seem to offer features people want. Crowdsourcing moment: What functions SHOULD a smartwatch offer?"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Herewith, some of the most intriguing responses:‏

Payments, of course!—@TheDigitalJen

Should yell at you when you're going to be late, based on calendar and GPS info.—‏@russbengtson

A mirror screen to check my teeth for spinach.—@TheGirlPie

A smartwatch should offer the ability to act as a second-factor authentication to log you into your phone, tablet or PC.—‏@rbrock

The only real benefit of a watch is it touches your skin all day long. So the Q is: What can you do with that? Health monitoring.—‏@BoschsPoodle

Number one, it shouldn't make my wrist sweat like crazy. Number two, it shouldn't shatter if I bump it into a wall.—@GaryMWatson

Time, date, slim, analog dial, seamless sync w/all apps, video chat, Bluetooth voice commands, GPS, camera, 5-year battery.—‏@wmecke

It's easier to ask Q from wrist rather than pulling out your phone. So, it could be a Siri portal for your phone.—‏@mamatastic

Well, watch designers seem to like square forms, but I think round is best. Think of a clickable dial on the edge, like the first iPods.—‏@rtietz

I'm going to go out on a limb and say no one really wants a smart watch.... It's technology overkill.—‏@petechod

GPS. Air thermometer. Health monitoring. Phone. Ability to drive KITT from Knight Rider.—‏@javaonline

Solar-power charging.—@yorkiebar16

A pulse detector that notifies relatives if it stops. I don't want to be found days later if I pass alone. Fear of mine.—‏@pulrich

Let's start with not requiring a recharge every day. I thought we solved that with kinetic-powered watches already….—@VirtualTal

Apps. The ability to morph the watch depending on the use. ‏@emiliocarlock

An FM radio chip, please.—@WayneCabot

Maybe a Pez dispenser.—‏@joeuelk

Tell time...and maybe the date.—‏@Cfountain72

People will know what they want as soon as Apple tells them—when it releases the iWatch.—@MendzappJames

David Pogue is the anchor columnist for Yahoo Tech and host of several NOVA miniseries on PBS.

More by David Pogue
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 6This article was published with the title “What Would Make You Buy a Smartwatch?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062014-6gLLwZsI1Y5B4Jh5SxgtJw

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe