New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Power for a Space Plane

Creating a revolutionary jet engine that could propel a space plane to orbit affordably and routinely is a tough but seemingly achievable task

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Engineers have long dreamed of building an aircraft that could soar from a runway to outer space and then back again--the way Luke Skywalker's X-wing fighter does in the Star Wars movies. But one thing has stood in their way: jet engines need oxygen to burn fuel, and the upper atmosphere does not have enough of it to sustain combustion. So flying to space requires rocket propulsion, for which both fuel and oxidizer are carried inside the vehicle. In even the most advanced launch system in use today, the space shuttle, about half the launch weight is the liquid oxygen and solid oxidizer it must lug aloft to keep its rocket fuel burning all the way to orbit.

One answer could come from a supersonic combustion ramjet, known as a scramjet, which would scoop oxygen from the atmosphere as it ascends. The weight savings from capturing air in flight instead of carrying it means the scramjet can deliver about four times the thrust of a rocket for every pound of propellant consumed. At last, after decades of intermittent development, practical scramjets appear poised to take wing.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Power for a Space Plane” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082006-4NX2wxooNkwBknTdmf9Jox

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe