Prehistoric Nebraska's Aquatic Rhinos

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Courtesy of University of Nebraska State Museum

Today manicured vistas of peaceful farmland characterize northeastern Nebraska. Ten million years ago, though, life was decidedly wilder. Remains from the local Ashfall Fossil Beds, discovered in the 1970s, have revealed that a marvelous menagerie of prehistoric beasts--including camels, three-toed horses, saber-toothed deer and rhinoceroses (right)--once roamed the region. In recent years the rhinoceroses, which belong to the genus Teleoceras, have kicked up controversy among paleontologists. Some argue that these animals were terrestrial; others believe they led semi-aquatic lives. Now chemical studies of fossil teeth are lending support to the idea that Nebraskan rhinos actually did spend a lot of time in the water.

Mark Clementz, a graduate student at the University of California at Santa Cruz, and UCSC researcher Paul Koch presented the new evidence--an analysis of oxygen isotopes in Teleoceras teeth--yesterday in Reno, Nev., at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. In earlier studies, Koch noted that teeth from hippos, which are semi-aquatic, contain more lighter oxygen isotopes than those from such land animals as zebras, elephants and modern rhinos. He attributes the difference to the varying degrees of water these animals lose through evaporation, in which water containing lighter isotopes is whisked away more readily. "Hippos wouldn't evaporate much because they're in the water all day and only leave the water to graze at night when it's cool and humid," he explains. In contrast, lighter oxygen isotopes would tend to dissipate quickly from animals that spent all of their time on land.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because the oxygen isotope composition of the body gets incorporated into the tooth enamel during tooth formation, a relatively fast process, the isotope values tend to vary. But in his analyses of living aquatic and terrestrial mammals, Clementz found that aquatic creatures display far less variability than terrestrial ones. And when he turned his attention to the prehistoric Ashfall fauna, he discovered that Teleoceras exhibited little oxygen isotope variability compared with known terrestrial beasts. Analyses of Teleoceras remains from two other sites yielded somewhat more variability. But considering this animal's broad geographic range, Clementz suspects that Teleoceras may have adapted its behavior according to different environs. "In Nebraska there's no question they were semi-aquatic," he asserts, "but they may have been more flexible in their ecological niche than modern hippos."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe