New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Primitive Crustacean Is Surprisingly Brainy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The small, eyeless crustaceans known as Remipedia have been underestimated, scientists say. According to a report published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the creatures actually have highly organized and well differentiated brains. The findings suggest that the animals may belong further up the evolutionary tree, alongside crabs and lobsters.

Discovered in 1979, Remipedia inhabit deep, dark ocean caves and use fangs and poisonous glands to kill their prey. But just how the animals should be classified amongst their fellow crustaceans is the subject of ongoing debate. Martin Fanenbruck of the University of Bochum in Germany and his colleagues reconstructed the brain anatomy (see image) of the remipede Godzilliognomus frondosus. They found that the brain is surprisingly complex, considering G. frondosus¿s generally slow movements and ancient body plan. The olfactory region in particular is very large, the team reports, because the creatures rely predominantly on smell to locate food in their cavernous surroundings.

The scientists estimate that the number of neurons G. frondosus has is comparable to that of higher-level malacostracans, such as crabs, shrimps and lobsters. Consequently, they argue, Remipedia should be considered a sister group to Malacostraca.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe