New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Protecting Your Data on The Cloud

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By connecting laptops and smartphones to enormous, remote computing banks, cloud computing gives us access to more processing power than could ever fit in any one of those devices, along with access to all our data and documents from anywhere in the world. The Achilles' heel is security: data that live in the cloud are vulnerable to hackers.

Solutions to two of the biggest vulnerabilities may be at hand, however. Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say they have devised a way to protect servers against memory-access pattern-analysis hacks and timing attacks. The solution, in brief, is to install a chip they call Ascend that sends out a smokescreen of false information every time a server requests data from a remote source.

Even when data are encrypted, the way in which a computer stores and accesses that data—its memory-access patterns—can reveal unsettling private details. Suppose a person goes to Google Maps and asks it to find a driving route from Boston to Toronto. “By looking at the access pattern, an eavesdropper learns where you are, your route and your final destination,” says M.I.T. computer scientist Christopher Fletcher.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cloud servers can also reveal secrets based on the amount of time they take to do certain computations. Imagine that a cloud server is asked to compare a surveillance photograph of a criminal suspect with random images on the Web. “The surveillance photo itself would be encrypted and thus secure from prying eyes, but spyware in the cloud could still deduce what public photos it was being compared with,” Fletcher says. The time the comparisons take could reveal something about the image of the criminal suspect. “Photos of obviously different people could be easy to rule out, but photos of very similar people might take longer to distinguish,” he explains.

These two types of attacks are especially dangerous because they are covert. The person on Google Maps and the people analyzing the criminal photograph get the same results that would have arisen if no one had been hacking the transactions. “They don't know that security has been compromised,” Fletcher says.

To protect against memory-access attacks, any time a server requests data from an address, it can request information from every address it knows. It could then throw away all the data except for the information it was seeking in the first place. The problem with this approach is pretty easy to see: it is far too time-consuming to be practical.

Ascend uses a more economical scheme. To start with, it assigns a piece of data it might look up to a random node in a network of data. When the processor requests data from a specific node in the network—for instance, an address in Toronto—it must send requests to all the other nodes in the network that are connected to it: nodes that contain addresses everywhere from Tampa to Timbuktu. An eavesdropper cannot tell which node the computer is looking for on any given path in the network. Ascend keeps this smokescreen robust by moving nodes around, too.

Ascend's method for protecting against timing attacks is simpler: it sends requests to a computer's memory at regular intervals, “even when the processor is busy and requires no new data,” Fletcher says. That way attackers cannot tell how long a computer is spending on any specific piece of data.

This security comes at a cost—Ascend would work at one-sixth the speed of conventional server chips that are running ordinary programs popular among users. “That's the difference between Google getting a response back to you at the speed it does now versus getting a response back several seconds later,” Fletcher says. The bigger drawback, at least for now, is that the chip exists only in theory. Fletcher and his colleagues detailed their chip architecture in June at the International Symposium on Computer Architecture in Tel Aviv, and they are building an Ascend chip now. They expect to finish the prototype in early 2015.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 6This article was published with the title “A new type of security chip guards against big data snooping” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 6 (), p. 46
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1213-46

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe