New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Pumped-Up Performance

Inflatables for a go-anywhere wing and a plane

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The deep thud of a 155-millimeter howitzer echoes off the mountains as what looks like an artillery shell speeds from the gun barrel. Within less than a second, however, the shell inflates into a full-fledged airplane with a six-foot wingspan. It soars through a smoke-filled sky toward a forest fire too hot and unpredictable for conventional airplanes to fly low and track.

It is just a matter of a few tweaks over the next year before inflatable vehicles should be able to fulfill such a role, say engineers at ILC Dover, an engineering company based in Delaware. Their goal is to have an unmanned aircraft that can be crumpled down and carried or stored in small spaces. Besides being able to fire them from howitzers, users could haul them around in backpacks or drop them from the air. Inflatable wings on otherwise normal airplanes would also allow engineers to double the craft's wingspan in flight. Such planes could fly to their destinations with the speed of their short wings, then extend their inflatables to burn less fuel while they loitered or slowed down for landing.

Inflatable wings passed a milestone in 2001, when inventors at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center in Edwards, Calif., dropped a rigid aircraft from nearly 1,000 feet and two inflatable wings successfully deployed. But those wings lacked flight controls. So ILC began working to design actuators, which would be small, flexible and steerable, into the wings. Engineers are now building photovoltaic cells that can be scrunched when the wing is folded. When it unfolds, the cells provide power to onboard machinery.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We have a number of different programs we are working on with this plane," says David Cadogan, the R&D manager at ILC. The potential for the plane to perform a variety of tasks lies, to some extent, in the fact that it can be scaled; it can range in size from 150 pounds down to 10, Cadogan says. A 100-pound version could carry various kinds of detection equipment, such as optical and infrared cameras, and ideally be operated by a single person.

For Bobby Jones, who helped to develop the wing while a student at the University of Kentucky and who now works on space suits at ILC, the groundbreaking aspect of the flying machine makes the project especially memorable. "I would talk about inflatable wings to people, and it would just be over their heads," he says.

In the long term, engineers at ILC and their collaborators at the University of Kentucky hope the wings will someday cut through the atmosphere of Mars. Engineers on the project say the technology is perfect for such a mission, where storage space on the flight to the planet is a scarce commodity.

ILC, which also designed the air bags that enabled the Mars rovers to land safely, is not the only firm interested in developing the technology. Vertigo, the Lake Elsinore, Calif., company that designed NASA's 2001 wings, continues to work on its version, which also includes a set of inflatables attached to a munition that can be fired from a howitzer. With several groups showing interest in the technology--including NASA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and companies that produce unmanned aerial vehicles--Cadogan might be aiming too low when he says the sky is the limit for these wings.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe