New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Quantum Leap

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Get ready for a change of perspective when you read to Vlatko Vedral’s cover story, “Living in a Quantum World." “According to standard physics textbooks, quantum mechanics is the theory of the microscopic world,” Vedral writes. And classical physics, in textbooks, “handles the largest of scales.”

Not so, proclaims Vedral, who calls this idea “a myth.” Quantum effects are harder to observe in the macroworld because of decoherence. But in the past decade experimentalists have seen quantum behaviors persisting on a macroscopic scale—and these effects turn out to be as pervasive as they are profound. Entanglement, a quantum property once seemingly confined only to small sets of particles, has been demonstrated in far larger systems—and even within living organisms.

Scientific American has, of course, covered many such profound discoveries in how the world works with the help of its scientist authors. More than 140 Nobel laureates have written for the magazine, often years before they won the honor. As laureates gather in Lindau, Germany, this month to share wisdom with a new generation of scientists, we mark the occasion with a special section, “A Nobel Celebration.” We present a selection of some our favorite articles in the fields of medicine and physiology from the past 60 years, including George Wald writing about the origin of life, Francis Crick about DNA, and Carol W. Greider and Elizabeth H. Blackburn about telomeres. Enjoy the sweep of science from then through today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Citizen Science
Gretchen LeBuhn had a problem. The San Francisco State University researcher wanted to study flower visits by bees, given the effects of climate shifts and the destructive illness called colony collapse disorder. But such ecosystem studies are very challenging and expensive because of the large areas involved.

She sent a note to 15 gardening groups asking if they might grow packets of a certain type of sunflower. Once the flowers bloomed, the idea went, the gardeners would spend a few minutes at certain times making observations about bee visits and inputting the data about what they saw into a form on a Web site LeBuhn set up. She hoped she might get at least some help. But now she had a new problem: more than 75,000 volunteers.

LeBuhn told me about the Great Sunflower Project at SciFoo—an annual “unconference” run by Google, O’Reilly Media and Scientific American’s parent Nature Publishing Group. I realized that Scientific American just had to help connect those citizen scientists and researchers such as LeBuhn. There are many kinds of citizen science, among them: making field observations as in the sunflower project, analyzing images and video such as the terrific Zooniverse.org projects, data crunching with spare computing power, and more.

At www.Scientific­Amer­i­can.com, we have launched Citizen Science, which lists the most compelling activities. Soon we’ll add our own. I hope you’ll help make science happen.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Quantum Leap” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 6 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062011-CJPZ2qnJALCa4lkiy8pvN

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe