Queen Bee Sperm Storage Holds Clues to Colony Collapse

Analyzing fluid from queen bees’ specialized sperm sacs can expose stressors

Honeybee colony

Honeybee colonies depend on the queen's store of sperm.

Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A honeybee queen mates only during one brief period of her life, storing sperm in a sac inside her body for later use. But if she fails to keep that sperm viable, her colony may collapse. This “queen failure” is a main factor in the U.S. drop-off in bee numbers. Identifying reasons for queen failure has proved difficult; queens show no clear symptoms when it happens. But a new study offers a way to zero in on causes, which could lead to a valuable diagnostic tool for beekeepers.

The queen is the only female in her colony who can reproduce. If she cannot lay viable eggs that produce both drone and worker bees, the colony's population plummets, says Alison McAfee, first author of the study and a bee researcher at North Carolina State University.* This is a significant concern for humans; as pollinators of crops such as blueberries and apples, “honeybees are responsible for around between $16 billion and $20 billion worth of economic contribution to agriculture,” says McAfee, who also works for the University of British Columbia. Climate change further threatens honeybees' survival, with previous research showing that high temperatures are also associated with colony loss.

To examine queen failure, McAfee and her colleagues performed a “molecular autopsy” in which they analyzed the fluid inside sperm-storing sacs after exposing queens to extreme heat, extreme cold or pesticides. They found that each stressor was associated with elevated levels of different proteins in the fluid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers identified the two most elevated proteins as indicators for each stressor. When they looked for these in failed queens donated by British Columbia beekeepers, they found proteins indicating exposure to pesticides and extreme heat but not extreme cold. The results were published in BMC Genomics.

McAfee and her colleagues are using these results to develop a diagnostic test that distinguishes between different causes of queen failure. This tool is in its early stages, but Susan Cobey, a bee researcher at Washington State University, who was not involved in the study and runs a bee-insemination business, is excited by its potential: “If you can determine what's going on with [the queens] and take some preventive control … and avoid losses in the field, that would be awesome.”

*Editor’s Note (1/14/21): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the description of bee reproduction.

Karen Kwon is a science journalist and editor based in the Washington D.C. area. She was a 2020 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Scientific American.

More by Karen Kwon
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Clues to Collapse” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 1 (), p. 15
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0121-15

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe