Rare-Diseases Project Hopes for Diagnostic Tool for All Diseases by 2020

Consortium aims for hundreds of new therapies by 2020.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Alison Abbott of Nature magazine

Prader-Willi syndrome. Fabry renal disease. Spinocerebellar ataxia. Few people have heard of these and the other 'rare diseases', some of which affect only hundreds of patients worldwide. Drug companies searching for the next blockbuster pay them little attention. But the diseases are usually incurable -- and there are thousands of them.

This week, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the European Commission launch a joint assault on these conditions, whose small numbers of patients make it difficult to test new treatments and develop diagnostic methods. The International Rare Disease Research Consortium being formed under the auspices of the two bodies has the ambitious goal of developing a diagnostic tool for every known rare disease by 2020, along with new therapies to treat 200 of them. "The number of individuals with a particular rare disease is so small that we need to be able to pool information from patients in as many countries as possible," says Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, the commission's director of health research.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the launch meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, on 6-8 April, prospective partners will map out research strategies to identify diagnostic biomarkers, design clinical trials and coordinate genome sequencing in these diseases. Nearly all the rare diseases, of which there are an estimated 6,000-8,000, are the result of small genetic changes.

The meeting will also discuss the governance of the project, which is most likely to be modeled on the pioneering Human Genome Project. As such, the consortium is open to research agencies and organizations from all over the world. Representatives from countries including Canada, Japan and some individual European nations are all attending the meeting, and may join the consortium. Those wishing to participate will have to pledge a minimum financial contribution, which has not yet been agreed, and share all relevant data. Indeed, the project will have to overcome numerous obstacles to information sharing, such as the fact that physicians in different countries often use entirely different words to describe the same disease.

Draghia-Akli points out that the project could yield major benefits for the emerging field of personalized medicine -- another political priority for the NIH and the commission -- which also faces the challenge of small populations of patients.

Regulatory agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency rely on large, randomized and controlled clinical trials when deciding whether to approve new medicines, and one of the aims of the consortium will be to develop alternative clinical-trial methods for diseases that affect few people.

These methods are becoming ever more important now that genome analysis is helping to break down common diseases into ever smaller subclasses. "Soon there will be no disease called breast cancer," says Draghia-Akli. Instead, the catch-all term will be replaced by "a large number of rare diseases, each of which causes malignant growth in breast tissue and requires individual treatment", she says.

The commission will launch a €100-million (US$140-million) call for research proposals in July, which will support the consortium's scientific goals by focusing heavily on developing appropriate clinical trials.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on April 4, 2011.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe