New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Rare, Dust-Shrouded Dying Star Revealed in New JWST Image

Before exploding as supernovae, massive Wolf-Rayet stars spew gas and dust into space, seeding the formation of future stellar and planetary systems

Giant stars may be the ultimate example of “live fast, die young.” Unlike our own sun, which will shine for billions of years, more massive stars can burn through their thermonuclear fuel in only a few million years before sloughing off their outer layers and exploding in a dramatic supernova.

Recently NASA unveiled a rare image from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) of one such stellar giant—a Wolf-Rayet star in the final, fleeting stages of its life. Named WR 124, it’s found in the constellation Sagitta and lies about 15,000 light-years away from Earth. The dying star is at least 30 times the mass of our sun but is shrinking quickly as it blasts hot gas into the cold vacuum of space.

“We’ve caught it early,” explains Anthony Moffat, a retired astrophysicist, who previously observed WR 124 using the Hubble Space Telescope and was not involved in the recent JWST measurements. Moffat has studied Wolf-Rayet stars for decades. “This is the youngest one I know of,” he says. The colorful cloud in the image—somewhat misleadingly called a planetary nebula—is only a few thousand years old. Now “the nebula is hugging the star,” he says. But as time flies by, it will bloom outward in expanding shells or rings of gas and dust.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Stars are nature’s fusion reactors, shining from the energy released by fusing hydrogen to form helium atoms. Once massive stars have burned through all their hydrogen, they begin fusing helium into heavier elements—through a more energetic fusion reaction that raises powerful stellar winds. Streaming away at speeds of millions of kilometers per hour, these winds carry the star’s outer layers with them, ejecting enormous volumes of gas and dust into space.*

This gas glows with infrared radiation, the same type of light that JWST detects. Astrophysicists created the spectacular image by combining data from two of JWST’s instruments, the Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) and the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI). The Hubble Space Telescope, which predominantly gathers light at optical wavelengths, had captured images of WR 124 before, but JWST’s observations show the star’s burgeoning nebula in stunning new detail.

“Personally, the most exciting part of this image is that we are capturing a rare event—that is, a Wolf-Rayet star—with a level of detail that can only be achieved with JWST,” says Macarena Garcia Marin, an astrophysicist at the European Space Agency, who works with MIRI.

Only massive stars can undergo the Wolf-Rayet phase, and not all of them do. Astronomers have estimated that there are only 1,000 Wolf-Rayet stars in our galaxy—about one in every 100 million. The closest is approximately 1,000 light-years away in the Gamma Velorum star system, which is visible from the Southern Hemisphere. Wolf-Rayet stars can be a million times as luminous as the sun, Moffat says. “What they don’t have in numbers, they make up for in light,” he adds.

“That dust is spreading out into the cosmos and will eventually create planets. And this is how we got here, in fact,” said NASA astrophysicist Amber Straughn in a panel discussion at the 2023 South by Southwest Conference in Austin, Tex., where the image was first revealed. “I think this is one of the most beautiful concepts in all of astronomy.”

But while we are all made of stardust, there seems to be a lot more of it in the universe than scientists can explain from a basic cataloging of obvious sources. “It’s always an interesting place to be in science when our theories don’t match our observations—and this is where we are right now with dust,” Straughn says. These detailed pictures of a dying star’s denouement, when it forges heavy elements and generates copious dust, can help scientists refine their understanding of this foundational process.

Someday—thousands or even millions of years from now but essentially tomorrow on galactic scales—WR 124 will explode in a spectacular supernova. Besides the rich bounty of dust and heavy elements, the explosion might leave behind a black hole. But physicists don’t have a great way to predict this with certainty. Moffat guesses the supernova remnant might instead stall out as a neutron star—the last stop before a collapsing star reaches a black hole’s ultimate oblivion. Without a glimpse from some observatory that, for us, remains in the far future, we may never know which outcome occurs for WR 124. But either way, its final fate remains the same, written in the stars and planets yet to form from its generous gift of cosmic dust.

*Editor’s Note (4/6/23): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the description of the speeds of the stellar winds.

A version of this article entitled “Science in Images” was adapted for inclusion in the June 2023 issue of Scientific American.

Allison Parshall is associate editor for mind and brain at Scientific American and she writes the weekly online Science Quizzes. As a multimedia journalist, she contributes to Scientific American's podcast Science Quickly. Parshall's work has also appeared in Quanta Magazine and Inverse. She graduated from New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute with a master's degree in science, health and environmental reporting. She has a bachelor's degree in psychology from Georgetown University.

More by Allison Parshall
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Science in Images” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 6 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0623-20

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe