New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Readers respond to the November 2025 issue

Letters to the editors for the November 2025 issue of Scientific American

Cover of the November 2025 issue of Scientific American against a gray background

Scientific American, November 2025

LIFE’S POSSIBILITIES

In “Life’s Big Bangs,” Asher Elbein reports on geochemist Abderrazak El Albani’s controversial argument that complex life emerged much earlier than thought and possibly did so multiple times, based on evidence from rock layers more than two billion years old. As David M. Ewalt kindly points out in “It’s Good to Be Wrong. Right?” [From the Editor], accepted facts in science have been proved wrong before, and El Albani’s idea is supported by recent discoveries from other researchers.* Certainly in this age, when we have finally admitted that we do not have all the answers yet, we can at least embrace the further study of an idea that has reasonable hard facts that could lead to its possible acceptance.

We believe that Earth has had five mass extinction events because of the huge amount of evidence left behind. Yet how many others may have there been for which we have found no clues? If conditions had been close enough for more complex multicellular life to come into being earlier in Earth’s history, those same borderline conditions could have changed and wiped it out. We humans must remember that our perspective of time and possibility is incredibly limited. Mother Nature is very patient.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


SCOTT CLINE VIA E-MAIL

SUPPLEMENTAL INFO

In “Supplements That Fight Inflammation,” Lori Youmshajekian both provides a concise review of acute and chronic inflammation and explains that there is very little objective scientific evidence of benefit for the great majority of supplements marketed to “support immunity.” One of the three supplements she noted that actually can suppress inflammation, vitamin D, deserves special mention.

Vitamin D is a metabolic precursor of the hormone calcitriol. The classical role of calcitriol is to stimulate intestinal calcium absorption, but it also has established roles in innate immunity. Intracellular synthesis of calcitriol stimulates synthesis of bactericidal peptides by macrophages in infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. Calcitriol may also suppress some harmful immune responses in diseases such as multiple sclerosis and injury to pancreatic islets during the development of type 1 diabetes.

A fascinating feature of vitamin D is that it isn’t always obtained through diet. Ultraviolet B (UVB) rays in sunlight produce the D3 form of the vitamin in humans’ skin, as noted in “The Rise and Fall of Vitamin D,” by Christie Aschwanden [January 2024]. People with ample exposure to UVB light do not require any dietary vitamin D.

While the amount of supplemental vitamin D that people who get little or no UVB-containing sunlight need to optimally produce calcitriol when it is required remains a subject of debate, the VITAL (Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial) studies noted in both articles demonstrated that vitamin D is not a drug and that vitamin D supplements don’t boost health in people who already have adequate levels of the vitamin (that is, those who already have a normal level of the vitamin D precursor 25-hydroxyvitamin D in their blood).

ARTHUR SANTORA WATCHUNG, N.J.

TELLING TIME

The clock puzzle “Find the Time,” by Heinrich Hemme [Advances], reminds me of a problem I set for my mathematically curious granddaughter many years ago. If you are given a clock with 12 at the top in which both hands are identical, you can sometimes read the time anyway. For example, if one hand points to 12, and the other points to 4, then the time must be four o’clock. If one hand points to 6, and the other points halfway between 10 and 11, then the time must be 10:30. Consider this: Can you always determine the time?

Dial orientation problems such as Hemme’s puzzle are related to this. Suppose that, on a dial that has no numbers and two equally sized hands, one hand points exactly right (to where a clock would usually indicate 3), and the other points exactly down (to where 6 would typically be). This would be impossible on a standard clock with 12 at the top. If the dial were rotated, however, so that 12 was to the right, then the time would be three o’clock. If 12 were at the bottom, then the time would be nine o’clock. Here are two questions to consider: Would this hand arrangement be possible if 12 were in any other position? And given any arbitrary hand arrangement, can you infer one or more possible positions for 12?

JOHN KNEISLY DELAWARE, OHIO

AIRBORNE AMPHIBIANS

Graceful Flop,” by Rohini Subrahmanyam [Advances; April 2025], describes a study that found that cricket frogs do not truly skim over the water but instead perform a series of “belly flops” in which they sink for a fraction of a second and then jump out. The researchers posited that the frogs may do so because they need time to reposition their legs to power each jump. I’d like to suggest that the purposes of a cricket frog’s reimmersion may be more involved and elegant.

Lifting a body out of the water requires considerable energy. At the size of the cricket frog, even the energy to overcome surface tension is most probably, in my opinion, significant. Although cricket frogs, like all adult frogs, have lungs, these organs alone may not suffice to deliver enough energy for aerial acrobatics, especially because aquatic amphibians take in much of their oxygen through their moist skin.

Even with high relative humidity over a brief time, whooshing through the air may dry a frog’s skin enough to reduce oxygenation during behavior that has increased the need for it. Reimmersion between jumps replaces skin moisture. Moreover, the water at the shallow depths in which the cricket frogs sink is probably nearly saturated with oxygen both from surface absorption and from algae and other plants. So brief immersion may act as the froggy version of a gasp for air, also rewetting the skin to absorb atmospheric oxygen during the next jump.

DAN HEMENWAY VIA E-MAIL

ERRATA

In a “A New View of CO2,” by Lee Billings [Q&A December 2025], the illustration should have depicted carbon dioxide as a linear molecule.

Flashes in the Night,” by Ann Finkbeiner [January 2026], should have said that China’s Einstein Probe began collecting data in mid-2024.

The Imperiled Orcas of the Salish Sea,” by Kelso Harper [January 2026], incorrectly said that in 2008 Deborah Giles helped to develop an acoustic device used in orca research. She worked with colleagues to attach such devices to the backs of orcas that year.

*Editor’s Note (2/26/26): This sentence was edited after posting to correct the description of Abderrazak El Albani’s idea.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe