New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Researchers Find Brain Receptors Linked to Mother-Infant Bonding

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Morphine acts on a part of the brain known as the opioid system, which is linked to pain, pleasure and addictive behaviors. The results of a mouse study published in today's issue of the journal Science suggest that the same brain circuitry plays a role in mother-infant bonding.

Previous animal research had implicated the opioid system in the forming of lasting attachments but exactly how it did this was unclear. In the new work, Francesca R. D'Amato of the CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Psychobiology and Psychopharmacology in Rome and her colleagues studied so-called knockout mice that lacked u-opioid receptors. The team observed newborn pups that had been separated from their mothers and found that mice lacking the receptors made fewer distress calls when they were abandoned than normal mice did. When the control animals were given morphine they calmed down, but the drug had no effect on the knockout mice. The researchers also gave the animals a choice between two cages, one they had been exposed to before and one that was unfamiliar. Whereas the normal mice all chose the familiar surroundings, two thirds of the knockout animals seemed content to bed down in a strange mother's nest.

The results suggest that u-opioid receptors are ¿critical players in attachment disorders,¿ the scientists note. In addition, they lend further support to the theory that malfunction of the opioid system could be to blame for the social indifference seen in autistic infants.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe