New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

RFK, Jr.’s overhauled autism advisory board cancels first public meeting

The cancellation of a meeting of the committee that guides federal autism research funding follows an announcement that an independent group of autism scientists would meet the same day

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. stands at a podium speaking with Donald Trump in the background.

Andrew Harnik/Staff/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The government’s advisory board on autism research has cancelled a public meeting scheduled for March 19. This would have been the first public meeting of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC), a group that guides federally funded autism research, since health secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., entirely overhauled the group’s membership in January. He appointed 21 new members, some of whom are vaccine skeptics.

The news of the cancellation broke on March 7, the same week that a group of autism experts formed an independent group to counter misinformation. This outside group, which calls itself the Independent Autism Coordinating Committee (I-ACC), scheduled a meeting on the same day as the federal IACC meeting. The rival group includes several former members of the federal advisory board.

The Department of Health and Human Services confirmed the cancellation in an e-mail to Scientific American. In a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) on Monday morning, the agency wrote: “The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee meeting originally scheduled for March 19 has been postponed. We recognize the importance of the committee’s work and the strong interest from the autism community in this meeting. We are actively working to reschedule and will share additional information as it becomes available.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The IACC historically meets four times a year to discuss directions for autism research and make recommendations to leaders of federal agencies that study autism or provide services to autistic people. It has not met since President Trump took office for his second term.

The formation of a competing committee of autism scientists is part of a broader push to fill in the gaps in public health left by agencies under the Trump administration. This includes states forming regional health alliances and medical organizations issuing vaccine schedule recommendations.

Helen Tager-Flusberg, an autism researcher who served on the federal advisory committee from 2019 to 2025, is now a member of the 12-person independent group. In a statement sent to Scientific American, she said that the new group “will become a vital tool to forcefully respond to the damage initiated by the Secretary of HHS to the future of autism science by appointing a committee that is filled with people who reject decades of evidence on the causes of autism.”

Allison Parshall is associate editor for mind and brain at Scientific American and she writes the weekly online Science Quizzes. As a multimedia journalist, she contributes to Scientific American's podcast Science Quickly. Parshall's work has also appeared in Quanta Magazine and Inverse. She graduated from New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute with a master's degree in science, health and environmental reporting. She has a bachelor's degree in psychology from Georgetown University.

More by Allison Parshall

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe