New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Rolling under the Sea: Scientists Gave Octopuses Ecstasy to Study Social Behavior  

Cephalopods on the recreational drug behave much like humans do, even touching and hugging their peers

Two-spot octopus. 

Mark Conlin Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Several octopuses might have recently become the happiest individuals in their species' history when researchers gave them MDMA—the party drug often called Molly or Ecstasy. This may sound like a contender for an “Ig Nobel Prize,” but the scientists behind the study, published in October in Current Biology, say tripping cephalopods can help us better understand the roots of sociability throughout the animal kingdom—including in people. “As human beings, we like to know where we came from,” says Gül Dölen, a neuroscientist at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and co-author of the new paper. “MDMA is an amazing tool for studying social behaviors across multiple species.”

MDMA (short for “3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine”) binds to transporter proteins in neurons, vastly increasing the availability of the signaling chemical serotonin. This flood of serotonin produces feelings of euphoria and sociability. Most research on the drug has been conducted in mice and rats, which respond similarly to how people do.

Rodents and humans diverged on the evolutionary tree around 75 million years ago, but a 500-million-year gulf separates us from octopuses. The cephalopods' invertebrate brains are vastly different from our own; they lack regions such as the cortex, basal ganglia and nucleus accumbens that we normally associate with complex interpersonal behaviors. Investigating how serotonin affects a creature so ancient and different from humans—far more so than, say, a rat—can illuminate whether the signaling chemical has always played a role in mediating friendly interactions or whether that function evolved more recently, Dölen says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dölen and her co-author Eric Edsinger, a research fellow at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., placed pairs of sober California two-spot octopuses—a typically antisocial species—in tanks together. One animal in each pair was secured under a mesh pot that allowed it to see, smell and touch the other octopus but prevented the two from fighting. As expected, the free-swimming octopuses chose to spend most of their time on the other side of the tank, as far as possible from the caged ones.

That completely changed when the uncaged octopuses were exposed to a tank containing dissolved MDMA and reintroduced to the experimental tank. Like humans at a rave, the drugged cephalopods relaxed their posture, moved their arms and somersaulted through the water as though they were dancing. They also spent significantly more time near their caged partners, sometimes attempting to touch them and even adopting a hugging posture around the mesh container.

The octopuses' raverlike reactions suggest that the human brain regions so closely associated with social bonding and affability may be evolutionary accidents rather than necessary elements, Dölen says. “This reiterates the importance of understanding function [at] the level of molecules,” she adds. “Focusing on brain regions does not give us the whole story.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe