New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Roundup: Distinctively Human

Three books explore what makes us unique

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Our fascination with what makes us us has inspired decades of research. One popular idea is that our capacity for language sets us apart from other animals. More recent accounts have incorporated emerging insights from evolutionary and developmental psychology. For instance, in A Natural History of Human Thinking (Harvard University Press, 2014), Michael Tomasello argues that our ability to take on different perspectives makes us exceptional. Tomasello writes that as our environment pushed us to become more cooperative, humans had to adapt their behaviors accordingly. In doing so, we developed the ability to see the world from other points of view. Tomasello even asserts that language came out of this growing need to know the minds of others.

Another take on the question of what sets us apart comes from brain science. In The Making of the Mind: The Neuroscience of Human Nature (Prometheus, 2013), cognitive psychologist Ronald T. Kellogg takes the broad view, adopting the stance that a network of interacting traits, rather than a single ability, makes humans special. The key factors, Kellogg proposes, are our complex memory, capacity for language, social intelligence and relationship with time, which allows us to mentally travel into the past and future.

For readers less wrapped up in the question of us versus them, science writer Jennifer Ouellette's book on me versus you might appeal. Ouellette (who blogs for Scientific American) tackles why, in spite of sharing nearly identical genetic material, our personalities can diverge so widely. In Me, Myself, and Why: Searching for the Science of Self (Penguin Books, 2014), she explains why our genes do not necessarily define who we are or who we become. She embeds herself into the narrative, taking us on her journey as she gets her genome sequenced and her brain scanned. Ultimately delving into the science of ourselves will not yield firm conclusions about our identities. Rather we come closest to understanding who we are through the narratives we weave about our own lives.

Victoria Stern is a contributing editor at Scientific American Mind.

More by Victoria Stern
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Roundup: Distinctively Human” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 1 (), p. 73
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0115-73a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe