New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

SARS Evolution Traced

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The recent revelation that three people in China may be ill with SARS--the disease that emerged and traveled the globe last year, disrupting international travel and commerce¿is fueling fears that the disease will return, perhaps more virulent than ever. Findings published online today by the journal Science describe how the virus has evolved and provide potential clues to developing effective treatments.

Researchers with the Chinese SARS Molecular Epidemiology Consortium analyzed the genomes of 63 samples of the SARS virus collected from patients infected at different times during last year¿s epidemic. The team determined that the two virus genomes that caused the earliest infections in people--11 seemingly independent cases in China¿s Guangdong Province--were identical to strains found in animal hosts. In the middle phase, which began with a so-called super-spreader event in a Guangzhou hospital, a strain missing 29 nucleotides became dominant. The scientists also found changes that caused alterations to amino acids of the virus spike protein, which allows the virus to adhere to host cells. "What we see is the virus fine-tuning itself to enhance its access to a new host: humans," study co-author Chung-I Wu of the University of Chicago explains. "This is a disturbing process to watch, as the virus improves itself under selective pressure, learning to spread from person to person, then sticking with the version that is most effective."

The late-phase virus was tentatively traced to one patient who became symptomatic on last February 7, according to the report. Noting SARS¿s "remarkable evolutionary tale," the scientists report that their findings support the idea that the virus made the jump from animals to humans, probably multiple times." Notes Wu, "The genetic fingerprints add a whole new layer to our understanding of the course of events in this epidemic."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe