New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Scientists Engineer Pigs with Heart-Healthy Meat

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 2004 scientists created mice that transformed unhealthy omega-6 fatty acids into beneficial omega-3 fatty acids. They did this by transplanting a gene from the roundworm C. elegans into mice, thus raising the possibility of genetically engineering livestock with higher levels of the good fat. Now a team of researchers has realized that vision, creating several healthy pigs with meat rich in omega-3s.

Yifan Dai of the University of Pittsburgh and his colleagues first transferred the roundworm gene--fat-1--to pig fetal cells. Randy Prather of the University of Missouri and his collaborators then cloned those cells and transferred them into 14 pig mothers. Twelve pigs were subsequently born and six of them tested positive for the gene and its ability to synthesize omega-3 fatty acids.

Numerous studies have shown that omega-3 fatty acids protect against heart disease. But meat from cows, pigs and other mammals typically has higher levels of omega-6 fatty acids, thanks to a feedlot diet of grains rich in the fat and an inability to transform it into its healthier version. For example, typical pork meat contains roughly 15 percent omega-6 fatty acids and only 1 percent omega-3; in contrast, omega-3s made up 8 percent of the engineered pigs' total muscle fat.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The six piglets appeared normal at birth though three subsequently had to be killed because of heart defects. These defects appear to be a result of the cloning process rather than the introduced gene, considering that team member Jing Kang of Harvard University has been able to breed and raise multiple generations of the mice without any such defects. And another litter of eight piglets cloned from one of the pigs that perished proved healthier and nearly as omega-3 rich, the researchers revealed in the paper presenting their findings, published online yesterday in Nature Biotechnology.

The research opens the possibility of a new model organism for human heart health and the distant prospect of incorporating such a gene into humans. "Pigs and humans have similar physiology," Prather explains. "We could use these animals as a model to see what happens to heart health if we increase the omega-3 levels in the body." It also provides a potential alternate food source for omega-3 fatty acids other than dwindling--and mercury-tainted--fish stocks.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe