New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Scientists Refine Musical Map of the Brain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A wrong note in a piano concerto can stick out like a proverbial sore thumb. That's because the relationships among pitches in a piece of music, known as tonality, primes the brain to hear certain sounds together. Scientists have identified the brain region involved in tracking the spatial relationships between tones in a piece of music. The findings, published today in the journal Science, suggest that the area is located just behind a person's forehead.

Petr Janata of Dartmouth University and his colleagues used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to track the brain activity of eight volunteers while they listened to music. Study co-author Jeffrey Birk composed a melody that moved through all 24 major and minor keys in a pattern representative of Western music. Depicted as a geometric shape, this pattern conforms to a donut-shaped figure known as a torus. By asking the subjects to identify test tones and the sound of a different instrument buried within the tune, the researchers were able to determine that the rostromedial prefrontal cortex was primarily responsible for tracing the music as it "moved" over the surface of the torus. "This region in the front of the brain where we mapped musical activity is important for a number of functions, like assimiliating information that is important to one's self, or mediating interactions between emotional and non-emotional information," Janata notes. The results, he says, help "provide a stronger foundation for explaining the link between music, emotion and the brain."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe