New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

See the Best Fossil Octopus Ever Found

Paleontologists have recently provided a new look at a beautifully preserved cephalopod

Octopus body shapes diversified widely earlier in evolutionary history than previously thought.

From “Proteroctopus Ribeti in Coleoid Evolution,” by Isabelle Kruta et al., in Palaeontology, Vol. 59; November 2016

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A good cephalopod fossil is hard to find. Although ammonite shells, belemnite guards and other indicators of hard body parts are abundant in the fossil record, paleontologists seldom get to see the characteristic soft-tissue anatomy of these many-armed swimmers. Finds are so rare that one from 1982 still stands out: a 165-million-year-old fossilized octopus uncovered in France.

J. C. Fischer and B. Riou named the eight-armed invertebrate Proteroctopus ribeti and described its suckers to the delight of other paleontologists. But despite its unprecedented level of detail, the fossil looked deflated—an animal preserved as a squished version of its former self. That made it difficult to figure out the particulars of the specimen's anatomy and how it related to other octopuses. More than three decades later paleontologist Isabelle Kruta of Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris and her colleagues have provided more detail about what this emblematic cephalopod looked like when alive. They reconstructed the animal in 3-D using synchrotron microtomography, a high-definition imaging technique.

Reinflated and restored, Proteroctopus most likely falls within a major octopus group called Vampyropoda—which contains the common octopus as well as the vampire “squid.” With the new images, the researchers found that Proteroctopus looked something like today's deep-sea forms of Vampyropoda—with a few differences. For instance, the ancient specimen has eight arms and a fin sticking out on either side of its body. Proteroctopus also lacks an ink sac, like the modern Vampyroteuthis. But the suckers of this Jurassic invertebrate are obliquely offset from one another rather than occurring side by side as in many extant octopuses. The study was published last fall in Palaeontology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What Proteroctopus can tell us about the ancestral octopus will rely on finding more fossils, but the specimen adds to an emerging consensus that octopus body shapes were already widely diversified by about 164 million years ago. “[Characteristics] we thought were quite recent in the evolution of the group, such as the shape of some suckers, were already present in the Jurassic,” Kruta says. As for what else the fossil record holds, paleontologists would surely give an arm and a leg to know.

Riley Black, who formerly wrote under the name Brian Switek, is the author of Skeleton Keys and My Beloved Brontosaurus. She lives in Salt Lake City, Utah. Follow her on Twitter @Laelaps and on Instagram @laelaps

More by Riley Black
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Fossil Octopus Is a Jurassic Jewel” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 3 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0317-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe