New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Self-Reflections

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It was one of those seemingly mundane moments, but I was thunderstruck when I realized the implications. Tossing on a cardigan, I happened to notice my toddler intently staring at me to figure out how to push a button through a hole in her sweater. Suddenly, I realized how much we learn how to do things and how to behave around others just by watching and copying.

At the time, nearly a decade ago, I had little idea about how extensively my child was mentally rehearsing my actions as she studied me. Since then, science has learned much more. When we see someone engaged in any activity—yawning, dancing, smiling—cells called mirror neurons that are scattered throughout the brain create an instant replay in our heads. Investigators believe that these cells may be the keys to cultural development and may even be responsible for humanity’s collective “great leap forward” 50,000 years ago, as David Dobbs explains in his article, “A Revealing Reflection.” Turn to page 22 to learn more.

Sigmund Freud, the iconic founder of psychoanalysis who was born 150 years ago on May 6, would have had a different take on my mother-daughter relationship (he held that girls were rivals with their moms for their fathers’ attentions).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In this issue we mark the anniversary of his birth and his impressive influence on all things psychological in a special section, “Freud at 150.” As neuropsychologist Mark Solms describes in “Freud Returns,” starting on page 28, neuroscientists are finding that biological descriptions of the brain may fit together best with theories Freud developed. A second feature, “Neurotic about Neurons,” by Steve Ayan, further details Freud’s notions and his eventful life; go to page 36. The last installment provides a modern take. In recent years, scientists have been testing what works—and what does not—in talk therapy, thereby bringing the power of research to the couch with “empirically supported therapies.” Surprisingly, these techniques are not without controversy, as psychologists Hal Arkowitz and Scott O. Lilienfeld explain in “Psychotherapy on Trial,” beginning on page 42. We hope the section tickles your id, ego and superego.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 17 Issue 2This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 17 No. 2 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0406-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe