Ship Building on the Clyde

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The "North British Mail" says, there are at present 100 vessels in course of construction on the Clyde, and of these only 6 are timber-built, all the rest being built of iron. It is also notable that these iron vessels consist both of steam and sailing vesssls, though the former class preponderates. The tonnage of the ships now in construction on the Clyde amounts to upwards of 60,000 tons. The engines of the steam part of this great fleet have an aggregate of more than 14,000 horse-power. The probable value of the whole, though necessarily inexact, cannot be much short of 2,000.000 sterling Yet, in a few months, this enormous amount of shipping will be off the stocks, and its place supplied by a new production, equally valuable. The number of workmen employed in building the vessels and making the machinery is about 15,000. The number of hands employed in raising the raw materials from the basin ot the Clyde within a circuit of 20 or 30 miles, lor these and similar great works, is still more immense. Another most gratifying feature of the ship-building trade of the Clyde is, that the employers in nearly all the establishments were workingmea themselves within the last thirty years. Most of them had attained the period of middle life before they turned their attention to iron boat-building at all. The men are not only the architects of their own fortunes, but the creators of a new branch of industry.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 35This article was published with the title “Ship Building on the Clyde” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 35 (), p. 278
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05141853-278c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe