New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Getting the same amount of rest each day may be tied to slower biological aging

Stable rhythms of rest and activity are associated with healthier biological age markers, a new study suggests

An illustration of a woman sleeping peacefully with an eye mask on a blue pillow.

Amr Bo Shanab via Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Whether you’re trying to get seven hours of sleep a night or take an hour-long run every morning, consistency is the key to building healthy habits. And now a new study suggests that having stable daily patterns of rest and activity may be linked to slower biological aging.

Scientists already knew that sleep can influence aspects of health that are affected by aging, such as cognition, metabolism and the body’s ability to repair damaged cells. At the same time, not getting enough rest is linked to accelerated aging and a heightened risk of age-related conditions, such as dementia. But the new findings suggest that getting the same amount of rest and activity each day without interruption—in other words, getting longer, sustained periods of rest and activity—may be a key to healthier aging.

“Our findings suggest rest-activity rhythms may be useful markers of the rate of physiological aging in adults,” said Adam Spira, the study’s co-senior author and a professor at Johns Hopkins University, in a statement.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers analyzed data from 207 adult participants in the Baltimore Epidemiological Catchment Area study, which has followed hundreds of people for decades. Then the team compared rest-activity rhythm data collected from the participants by a smart device that they wore on their wrist for seven consecutive days with blood tests done years before and tests performed around the same time that the participants wore the activity tracker. The scientists also collected diaries from the participants that documented when they went to bed and woke up and when they took part in anything else that might be considered rest, such as a nap.

The researchers looked specifically at the participants’ scores on four epigenetic clocks—essentially, these are markers on DNA that change with age, giving an estimate of the biological age of a tissue or individual that may or may not match a person’s chronological age. The participants in the study were 68 years old on average.

People with more consistent rest-activity rhythms tended to have lower age scores on two of the four epigenetic clocks; the other two clocks did show some association, but it wasn’t enough to meet the threshold of statistical significance, the researchers said.

The results are intriguing, but the study does have some limitations: the sample size is small, and there may be aspects of each participant’s day-to-day activity and sleep, as well as their health and lifestyle, that the researchers just didn’t capture.

Still, co-senior study author and Johns Hopkins professor Brion Maher said in the same statement that the research team suspects the links it has identified “underestimate what is going on in the general population.” Ultimately, the researchers hope to conduct clinical trials to see if making a person’s rest-activity cycle more consistent could slow aging.

“If supported by future research, these rhythms might emerge as potential targets for interventions to slow the aging process,” Spira said.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe