New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Small Genetic Change Makes Flu Virus Far More Deadly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 1997, a particularly lethal form of the influenza virus swept through Hong Kong, killing one in three of the people it infected. New research on this deadly strain, dubbed H5N1, has revealed how it differs from more benign flus. The frightening answer is not much. "We have found that a limited number of very tiny genetic changes in a specific gene, one called PB2, can have a big effect on how potent the influenza virus is," Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin-Madison says. "Because the influenza virus constantly mutates, and because only a few changes can make a non-pathogenic virus highly pathogenic, we should assume that an outbreak of any new strain or subtype is potentially dangerous to humans."

Kawaoka and colleagues, who publish their findings today in Science, tested samples of H5N1 in mice, which respond to the virus much as humans do. Based on the lab animals' reactions, they divided the samples into two groups: highly lethal and relatively benign strains. Next they genetically engineered influenza viruses from scratch and started swapping into them one by one genes from the lethal and harmless viruses. In this way, they narrowed in on the key difference that made strains of H5N1 so dangerous¿namely a single change in an RNA unit of the PB2 gene.

Scientists believe the PB2 gene may encode an enzyme that helps the virus force host cells to crank out more virus particles. "We don't know if the mutation we studied is involved in that process," Kawaoka adds, "but our next step will be to find out."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe