New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Snowflakes swirl according to surprisingly simple math

Every snowflake is different, but new technology reveals they all swirl the same

Close-up image of a snowflake.

Cepreй Бypбoha/Getty Images

Editor’s Note (2/23/26): With a major snowstorm burying parts of the Northeast, we’re reposting this 2024 piece on the fascinating math of how falling snow swirls.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For all snowflakes' infinite structural variation, their journeys to Earth are remarkably similar—even predictable. Researchers tracking more than half a million falling flakes have uncovered a broad mathematical pattern that describes precisely how they swirl through the air.

University of Utah atmospheric scientist Tim Garrett, senior author of a new study in Physics of Fluids, has studied snowflakes for nearly a decade. Although the behavior of such tiny, ephemeral objects may seem inconsequential, their fall speed is a key variable in forecasts of weather and climate, even in the tropics; most precipitation, regardless of where it eventually ends up, begins as snow.

Snowflake movement is typically studied in laboratories under controlled conditions that don't reflect the complexity of nature. Scrutinizing falling snowflakes in the field has challenged atmospheric scientists for decades.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For a new approach, Garrett teamed up with University of Utah engineers Dhiraj Kumar Singh and Eric Pardyjak to build a machine that measures the mass, density, area and shape of individual snowflakes that land on a hotplate. By placing this instrument underneath video cameras and a plane of laser light, the researchers could track how each snowflake moved in response to outdoor air turbulence.

“We were able to let the atmosphere express itself, to behave in a way that was completely uncontrolled by a scientist,” Garrett says. “I think that's why we ended up uncovering an extraordinary simplicity, an elegance.”

The researchers discovered a linear correlation between a snowflake's average acceleration—which, in this study, is equivalent to how much it swirls—and its Stokes number, a value that describes how quickly an object responds to changes in air turbulence. For instance, a wide and fluffy flake swirls more than a streamlined one.

Using the Stokes number, researchers can now predict how much a single snowflake will swirl as it falls. On a broader scale, the team was surprised to find that the distribution of average snowflake swirliness fits a single, nearly perfect exponential curve—a fixed mathematical pattern—despite the wide variability of air turbulence and range of snowflake shapes and sizes.

The cause of this regularity remains a mystery for now. But Garrett says that it could be related to how turbulent air prompts snowflakes to fluctuate in shape and size—which in turn can tweak their responses to that turbulence.

Further research is needed to assess the mathematical pattern's universality, says University of Minnesota mechanical engineer Jiarong Hong. “We will look into the applicability of [this result] to our data sets of snowflakes captured under different conditions,” including varied altitudes and ground roughness, he adds.

If the pattern does hold universally, “the fact that there's this simplicity suggests there's going to be a simple explanation,” Garrett says. “We just have to find it.”

Ellyn Lapointe is a New York City–based science journalist with a special interest in covering the life sciences.

More by Ellyn Lapointe
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Swirling Secrets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 3 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0324-10

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe