Solar Cells Could Slim Down via More 'Optical States'

A recipe to increase a thin film's appetite for light.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Kate McAlpine of Nature magazine

Thin-film solar cells are plagued by diminishing returns: thinner panels are cheaper to make, but as the semiconductor layer gets thinner it loses its light-trapping ability. Researchers at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena now report the secret to making thin layers more absorbent--making it possible to use layers up to 100 times thinner than those in the commercial devices available today.

A theoretical light-trapping limit, called the ray-optic limit, sets out the maximum amount of light that a material can trap, but reaching that pinnacle requires the material to be thick1. Researchers have made thin-film solar cells with absorbing layers just tens of nanometers thick, but such a fine film can allow much of the light to pass through before it has a chance to be absorbed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


However, Harry Atwater and his colleagues argue in Nano Letters that cleverly made thin layers could help solar cells to overcome the ray-optic limit. When the layers have thicknesses below the wavelength of visible light--400-700 nanometers--they interact with its wave properties rather than treating it as a straight ray. "In this regime, where the structures we make are at or below the scale of the wavelength of light, suddenly all the rules change," says Atwater. In this case, rather than depending on thickness, a material's ability to absorb light depends on the wave interactions between the light and the absorber.

Through calculations and computer simulations, Atwater's team demonstrated that the trick to upping a material's thirst for light is to create more "optical states" for the light to occupy--which are like slots that can accept light with a certain wavelength, similar to the energy levels of electrons in atoms. The number of optical states in a material depends, in part, on its refractive index, which determines how much the material shortens the wavelength of light passing through it. The higher the refractive index, the more compressed the light, and the more optical states the material can support.

In 2010, Shanhui Fan of Stanford University in California and his colleagues identified the number of optical states as a major factor in how much light a material could absorb. They studied a material with a low refractive index bordered by a layer with a high refractive index. Near the interface, they found that the presence of the higher-index material effectively raised the refractive index of the low-index material, allowing it to absorb more light.

Atwater's team has generalized this idea to show that cramming in more optical states can make many thin-film light absorbers take up more light than usual. The study also demonstrates that this can be accomplished in many ways--by coating the absorbing layer with metal or with a crystal structure that contains patterns on the scale of the wavelength of light, by embedding the absorber in a more complex three-dimensional array. Through different mechanisms, each of these strategies raises the effective refractive index of the absorber.

"Their work provides a comprehensive study of a variety of different designs that can potentially go beyond the ray-optic limit," says Fan.

Robert Collins of the University of Toledo, Ohio, who works with the thin-film photovoltaic start-up company Xunlight, says the team's concept is a "fundamental first step." But he anticipates technological challenges ahead, such as a requirement for extra processing steps to create and control films on a sub-micrometer scale in an industrial setting, the added cost of which must be balanced by the savings in materials.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on January 11, 2012.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe