New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Solar Storms Can Hinder Bird Migration

New research suggests that solar storms interfere with the magnetic compass that birds use for long-distance travel

Close up rear view of Baltimore Oriole in flight

A male Baltimore Oriole in flight. Orioles are nocturnal migratory birds.

The same solar storms that can paint the polar skies with dancing lights might also interfere with a very different phenomenon: bird migration.

Nocturnally migrating birds are less likely to fly—and in some cases, more likely to drift where the winds take them—during space weather events that disturb the magnetic field that surrounds our planet. That’s the same field that, among other cues, birds use to guide their paths, according to research published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. The study focused on birds that move at night, as most migrators do, particularly perching birds such as warblers, thrushes and sparrows.

“We really didn’t know what we would find at all, because at face value, [linking] space weather and bird migration sounds kind of wacky,” says Ben Winger, an ornithologist at the University of Michigan and senior author of the new research paper. “But we do know that birds use the magnetic field, and the magnetic fields do get disrupted, so there ought to be a relationship.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Space weather includes the solar wind of charged particles that constantly streams across the solar system; coronal mass ejections that send blobs of the sun’s plasma into space; and solar flares that shoot bursts of radiation from our star.

Earth’s magnetic field swathes our planet in a protective bubble that blunts the worst of the sun’s outbursts, but strong events can still affect human infrastructure such as GPS satellites and power grids. And some of this weather can affect the magnetic field in ways that are not perceptible to humans.

Typically, studies of magnetic sensing in birds have focused on individual animals and have tested how they responded to exposure to an artificial magnetic field, for example, or a fake night sky with star positions that didn’t match their magnetic location. But Winger and his colleagues decided to look at bird behavior in real life and on a much larger scale by using data generated by radar stations employed for weather forecasting. During spring and fall migrations, birds take to the sky in such quantity that radar stations can tally the number of animals in flight.

When the researchers compared 23 years’ worth of radar data from across the central U.S. with magnetic field measurements from the stations, the scientists found a noticeable decrease in the sheer number of birds migrating on nights with high geomagnetic activity.

“I’m not surprised that disturbance in the field has an effect,” says Marilyn Ramenofsky, a behavioral endocrinologist at the University of California, Davis, who specializes in bird migration and was not involved in the new research.

Winger and his colleagues looked at spring and fall migrations separately and factored in each night’s cloud cover because birds are also known to use the stars to navigate, among other resources. In general, the birds seemed to be more sensitive to space weather disturbances in the fall—when they would have faced less pressure to arrive promptly and when the year’s hatchlings would have been making their first migration—as well as on cloudy nights, the researchers found.

“It shouldn’t be surprising to us that they can respond and that they’re flexible and that this doesn’t show them for a complete loop and that they use other cues,” Ramenofsky says. “There’s so much information out there, and birds tend to use it all.”

Both she and others noted, however, that the study only identified a potential association between magnetic field disturbances and bird behavior. It’s possible that some third variable is affecting both. “With correlations, it’s always very hard to draw conclusions,” says Nele Lefeldt, a neuroscientist at Rice University, who was not involved in the new research. “That being said, this group of scientists definitely did a really good job getting as close as they can to the answer with the means that they had.”

Overall, the study is a reminder to look beyond humans’ sensory capacities when trying to understand the behavior of nonhuman species.

“Humans don’t perceive these magnetic fields, so we don’t perceive a magnetic storm the way we would a weather storm, and so we have no idea that there’s something going on that’s a problem, whereas it turns out that birds are perceiving an actual disturbance,” Winger says. “It suggests that these things happening in space that seem like they’re not relevant to Earth actually are.”

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe