New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

SpaceX’s Starlink Satellites Leave Streaks in Asteroid-Hunting Telescope’s Images

Despite efforts to reduce light pollution from the satellites, their disruptions of astronomical observations are increasing at an alarming pace

Time-lapse image of rocket taking off against darkened sky.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket carrying 49 of the company’s Starlink satellites soars into orbit from Kennedy Space Center on Jan. 18, 2022.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A prime ground-based observatory that scans the sky for exploding stars and dangerous near-Earth asteroids is struggling with disruptive light streaks from SpaceX's Starlink internet satellite constellation, a new study revealed. 

The observatory, called the 

Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), opened its telescope eye in California in 2017. Scanning the entire sky every two days, the observatory looks for the temporary brightening or sudden appearance of objects that remain visible only briefly. It hunts for supernova explosions of dying stars and  asteroids passing close to Earth. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new review of its observations going back to 2019, the year when SpaceX began launching its ambitious 

Starlink megaconstellation, has revealed that a considerable percentage of the telescope's views has streaks in it caused by the satellites as they passed overhead.

Images capturing the twilight sky around sunrise and sunset are the most affected, the team behind the new study said 

in a statement. These observations are particularly important for spotting potentially dangerous asteroids coming from the direction of the sun, the scientists added.

The ratio of affected twilight images has risen steeply with the growth of the Starlink megaconstellation from only 0.5% in late 2019 to 20% in late 2021. But only a fraction, about 15%, of SpaceX's envisioned constellation of up to 12,000 satellites are currently in orbit, suggesting the ultimate impact will be much larger. Moreover, SpaceX hopes to eventually expand the size of its internet-beaming fleet to a whopping 42,000 spacecraft. And there are other companies with similar plans including OneWeb, Amazon or China's SatNet. 

To date, SpaceX has 1,469 active Starlink satellites and 

just launched 49 new satellites late Tuesday (Jan. 18), the company's second Starlink launch of 2022.

"We don't expect Starlink satellites to affect non-twilight images, but if the satellite constellation of other companies goes into higher orbits, this could cause problems for non-twilight observations," Przemek Mróz, the lead author of the study and former postdoctoral scholar at California Institute of Technology (Caltech), which runs ZTF, said in the statement. 

Overall, the scientists found 5,301 satellite streaks on observations from the studied period.

Not everything is doom and gloom, however. The study also found that since SpaceX started installing 

visors on its satellites, the brightness of the craft went down by a factor of five and so did that of the streaks. 

Caltech physics professor Tom Prince, a co-author of the study, added that only about 0.1% of pixels in an image are damaged by the streak. 

"There is a small chance that we would miss an asteroid or another event hidden behind a satellite streak, but compared to the impact of weather, such as a cloudy sky, these are rather small effects for ZTF," he said in the statement. 

Astronomers have been concerned about the potential impact of Starlink satellites on new discoveries since the first batch reached orbit in May 2019. At first, many skywatchers were in awe at the spectacular 

string of pearls crossing the sky after the launch, but that awe was only shortlived. 

Since then, the International Astronomical Union has called on the United Nations to 

protect pristine night sky as human heritage, and a recent workshop of the American Astronomical Society compared the potential damage megaconstellations can cause to astronomy to that caused by light pollution. 

The controversial technology has many opponents among space safety experts as well. According to Professor Hugh Lewis, Europe's lead authority on space debris, Starlink satellites are now 

responsible for more than 50% of collision risk situations between two satellites in orbit.

Scientists studying Earth's atmosphere are worried about the possible effects megaconstellation satellites may have on the planet's climate. Megaconstellation operators such as SpaceX plan to regularly replace their technology with newer models and deorbit the old used satellites for burn-up in Earth's atmosphere. This burn-up, however, will 

produce potentially dangerous particles that might have unforeseen effects on the planet. 

The ZTF study was published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters on Monday (Jan. 17)

Watch This Next

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe