Speaking through Tubes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Noticing in this week's number of the Scientific American an article on Acoustic Telegraphs, I take the liberty of pointing out to you some experiments made by Biot, in one of the pipes of the water works in Puis, the distance being 951 metres (over 3,000 feet). The principal results of these experiments were :— 1st, The time taken in asking a question, and receiving an answer, was 5"'58, during which the sound of the voice had been propagated twice through th1'l length of the pipe or over 6,000 feet. 2nd. The softest whisper which could possibly be articulated,. was distinctly understood, 3rd. Low and acute sounds, as well as loud and soft ones, we re propagated with equal velocity. • The bore of the pipe is not give n, but trom the length ofthe pipe, I suspect that it was probably one of the mains from the distributing reservoir, which, if I recollect right, are not less than twelve inches, perhaps more. The experiments were made, not only with the voice, but by firing pistols, playing the flute, &c. But it was found necessary to make the experiments during the greatest stillness of the night, because in the day time, in such a large city, the atmosphere is filled with such confusion of various sounds, and the ground so much jarred by carriage wheels and other ' causes of constant friction and percussions that metallic pipes of such size, are affected by vibration, and the column of air within was at times so filled with confused I!oises, as to render inaudible even a loud call. This, however, would not be the case in small gut- ta percha pipes. C. S. Quilliard. Rondout, Dec. 11th, 1852.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 15This article was published with the title “Speaking through Tubes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 15 (), p. 115
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12251852-115

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe