New Homes on the Range: Species Shift Across Yosemite

Repeating a century-old survey, ecologists find that global warming is forcing mammals in the national park up and, potentially, out


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pioneering ecologist Joseph Grinnell in 1914 began a seven year survey of the animals living in Yosemite National Park in California. Even then, human impacts such as the transformation of the Central Valley into an agricultural oasis were changing the landscape and the animals who lived there.

Nearly a century later, one cause for the transformation of California wildlife has come to overshadow all others: global warming. Now scientists have found that a rise of 6.7 degrees Fahrenheit (3.7 degrees Celsius) in average nighttime low temperatures (since 1920 when Grinnell concluded his research) is causing mammals in Yosemite to get a move on.

Evolutionary biologist Craig Moritz, director of the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (founded by Grinnell) at the University of California, Berkeley, and his colleagues traced Grinnell's footsteps across the mountainous Yosemite terrain. Their inspiration: a quote on the wall of the museum from a 1910 paper authored by Grinnell in which he noted that future ecologists would be able to use the data he collected to determine how the same were faring a century later. They found that 16 of the 28 species documented by Grinnell in Yosemite had moved as far as 3,280 feet (1,000 meters) up the slopes in search of suitable climes—and that at least three, including the alpine chipmunk unique to California, had edged closer to extinction.

"The communities [of animals] are going to be very different—which species co-occur with which species," Moritz says. "That's already very clear. We can see that now."

The researchers measured populations using updated trapping methods, such as yogurt cups to lure voles and shrews, at 40 of the same sites where Grinnell camped nearly a century ago; in cases in which it was impossible to determine exactly where he had collected his specimens, "we sampled in similar habitats at the same elevation," says team member and environmental scientist Steven Beissinger of U.C. Berkeley.

The scientists found that fast-breeding species such as the California vole and California pocket mouse expanded their ranges by colonizing higher ground that was no longer as cold at night. Those animals such as Allen's chipmunk and the bushy-tailed woodrat already living on the peaks persisted in smaller areas at the highest extent of their ranges but their habitat had shrank. The alpine chipmunk now lives only 9,600 feet (2,925 meters) above sea level—an upward  shift of nearly 2,000 feet (610 meters) from Grinnell's day—leaving it little leeway if the climate continues warming to move farther up without slipping off the mountainside entirely.

"I would want to monitor some of these species over the relatively short-term future, maybe every 10 years, to determine if the trend we see is continuing," says biologist James Patton of U.C. Berkeley, who also participated in the survey.

It remains unclear, however, exactly how these tiny mammals will fare if the average temperature continues to climb at its current rate. As it stands, the relative diversity of species in any given spot remains unchanged and closely related species  in some cases showed very different responses—some declining and some thriving. And other species demonstrated an ability to change preferred habitats. "The most surprising thing was finding [the] pinyon mouse up in the High Sierra," Moritz says about the one-ounce (28-gram) mouse, which researchers found had jumped from its namesake pinyon pine habitat to higher elevation forest dominated by white bark pines. "As one of my colleagues put it: 'What the hell are you doing here?' That was the first indication that something big might be going on."

Though climate change is the most likely suspect, researchers fell short of proving it is behind all these habitat shifts given some puzzling findings. For instance, "pika are strongly affected by high temperatures but the average high temperatures haven't changed," Moritz notes. Nevertheless, the pika's range has been diminished. "We can't connect the pika physiology to the observed change yet."

These modern-day researchers hope that future scientists will find their work as helpful as they found the 4,000 specimens, 3,000 pages of field notes and 700 photos left behind by Grinnell. But it is already clear that turning the Yosemite area into a protected National Park in 1890 has permitted species to adapt to this rapid shift in climate by moving through relatively undisturbed habitats. "What we've looked at so far is a best-case scenario because we're looking at a protected landscape," Moritz says. "Community reorganization is a natural phenomenon but perhaps not at this pace. Can these species adjust to co-occur or not? I don't know. It's a grand experiment that I sort of wish wasn't happening."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe