New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These spiders weave themselves giant doppelgängers to scare away predators

Spiders scare off predators by seemingly supersizing themselves

Spider sewing a spiderweb

This spiderweb structure presents the illusion of an intimidating bigger spider.

Richard Kirby

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What’s scarier than a spider? A really big spider, of course. A newfound defensive tactic takes advantage of this idea: researchers documented spiders building giant spiderlike silhouettes on their webs to ward off predators.

These decoys are an example of “web decorations” that some spiders are known to produce, often to prevent getting eaten, avoid bird strikes or attract prey. Such ornaments come in many shapes and sizes, but this is the first time scientists have documented spider-shaped decor.

From 2012 to 2022 a research team collected observations of these unusual webs in Peru, the Philippines and Madagascar, focusing on about 300 individuals from the genus Cyclosa that are typically only a few millimeters long. The researchers published their findings in Ecology and Evolution.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The spider doppelgängers are made of prey carcasses, plant debris, and other organic materials. They have a central structure from which “legs” branch out. The team proposes that the constructions serve primarily as a defense from predators such as hummingbirds or helicopter damselflies. But different species might use them in different ways.

In Peru, the spiders seem to use the decoys “as puppets,” says study co-author Phillip Torres, an entomologist and television host. “They will be on the top of the figure, and they shake the web, so they are pretending to be a bigger spider.” Small predators might be scared by a larger spider, and predators that specialize in eating the real, smaller arachnid might want to avoid a supersized one. In the Philippines, the spiders seem to instead hide inside the structure and wait for the predator to go away.

Dinesh Rao, an ecologist at Veracruzana University in Mexico, who wasn’t involved in the study, emphasizes that figuring out the constructions’ precise function requires more research: “You need either careful observations or experimental conditions where you actually look at how [predators] respond to these structures.”

Gennaro Tomma is a freelance journalist who covers science, with a focus on the natural world, biodiversity, conservation, climate change, environmental and science-related policies, and more. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Science, National Geographic, New Scientist and other outlets. Find more on his website: https://gennarotomma.it

More by Gennaro Tomma
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Spider Illusionists” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 2 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022026-77pdnSbM0EmJp6ukir2zH3

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe