New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Squiggles in Sandstone May Double Age of Earliest Multicellular Animals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To the untrained eye, they're not much to look at--a smattering of tiny squiggles decorating slabs of sandstone. But don't let their modest appearance fool you: these may be the earliest traces of multicelluar animals, or metazoans, yet found--more than twice as old as the roughly 600-million-year-old remains considered by most paleontologists to be the first uncontroversial metazoans. Researchers writing today in the journal Science argue that the unassuming doodles are most likely trails left behind by mucus-producing, wormlike creatures that crossed the sands of southwestern Australia at least 1.2 billion years ago.

This is not the first time metazoan fossils considerably older than 600 million years have been reported. But earlier cases have generally been reinterpreted as nonmetazoan fossils or the results of inorganic activity. The newly discovered specimens, say Birger Rasmussen of the University of Western Australia and his colleagues, do not lend themselves to nonbiological explanation (although that possibility cannot be ruled out for disk-shaped imprints also visible on the rocks). Nor do the fossils resemble the forms produced by nonmetazoan organisms.

But if relatively large, multicellular animals capable of getting around existed by 1.2 billion years ago, why did 600 million years apparently then pass before life on earth attained the diversity associated with the famed Cambrian explosion? This is the million-dollar question scholars will face if the team's interpretation of the Australian material meets with approval. For their part, Rasmussen and his collaborators suggest that extreme environmental conditions just before the Cambrian "may have been the final bottleneck before which no diversification of organisms with metazoanlike modes of life could have had lasting success."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe