New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Stephen Streiffer

The materials scientist describes how science is a contact sport

Stephen Streiffer posing in a blue suit.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

This article is part of “The Young American Scientists,” which includes stories of 28 extraordinary scientists poised to change the world, as well as a deep look at the past, present and future of science and innovation in the U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Stephen Streiffer is director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and a materials scientist specializing in nanostructured materials and advanced characterization techniques. Before joining ORNL in 2023, he held leadership roles at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University and Argonne National Laboratory.

[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]

How would you describe the current state of American science?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science is a full-contact sport on a global scale. International competition is fierce, and the nation’s future success is tied to winning global races in artificial intelligence, quantum [technology], fusion energy, advanced nuclear energy and critical minerals. Through consistent investment over decades, America remains a scientific global leader and is positioned to succeed in those areas because of its expertise, facilities and institutions. As other nations continue to focus their investments on developing critical technologies and re-creating what has made America a scientific powerhouse, we have an opportunity to ensure our leadership for the next century by continuing to tackle the most complex challenges. We must invest and compete.

What needs to change in American science?

The problems facing the world right now place extreme urgency on discovery and innovation. We must find ways to dramatically accelerate scientific inquiry and time to solution. We also must remember that science requires time, and we need to maintain patience to allow our scientists to experiment and collaborate, for new facilities to be built and become operational and for public-private partnerships to move breakthroughs from the labs to our everyday lives. In today’s world of instant answers at your fingertips, patience is hard. By strategically planning and maintaining focus on our missions, we can continue American success in advancing innovation in medicine, basic science, energy, national security, and more.

What gives you optimism right now?

The Department of Energy’s Genesis Mission is an exciting opportunity for the nation to put its expertise and investments behind AI and quantum computing for the acceleration of discovery. AI, in particular, is rapidly changing everything. In scientific research, we can use AI to better understand massive, high-quality datasets and unleash the full potential of our nation’s most advanced scientific tools for new discoveries. The Genesis Mission brings together all 17 of the Department of Energy’s national laboratories—including Oak Ridge National Laboratory—alongside universities and industry to make this vision actionable at unprecedented scale. The potential is immense, and we are likely to look back in 50 years and be amazed how the Genesis Mission has helped us to solve challenges we’ve been working on for, in some cases, decades, like bringing fusion energy to the grid or scaling quantum computing far beyond classical computing systems.

What’s your best advice for an early-career scientist?

I encourage early-career scientists to connect through mentors, professional societies and other groups. This will allow them to begin to understand how their work fits within the bigger picture and why their research matters. This broader context and purpose will give scientists—no matter where they are in their careers—a pathway for meaningful contributions to their scientific field, institution and society.

How has your field changed in the past few years?

With more than 30 years of experience across the Department of Energy’s national lab system, I have had an opportunity to be part of multiple national missions and pursue emerging trends. What is happening currently in biology and medicine—with biomedical research accelerating the understanding of disease and developing new drugs—is fascinating and will revolutionize the approach to human health. Similar rapid advancements occurred with chemistry in the 19th century and physics in the 20th century, and the 21st century will go to biology and medicine.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe