New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Strange Blobs near Earth’s Core May Be Relics of Moon-Forming Collision

An impact with a protoplanet called Theia 4.5 billion years ago seems to have left remnants deep inside Earth

A giant collision between the ancient protoplanet Theia and the proto-Earth about 4.5 billion years ago.

The protoplanet Theia, which was roughly the size of Mars, slammed into proto-Earth 4.5 billion years ago (artist’s impression).

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For decades, scientists have been baffled by two large, mysterious blobs in Earth’s mantle. These rock formations are thousands of kilometres long and slightly denser than their surroundings, hinting that they are made of different material than the rest of the mantle.

New computer modelling supports a dramatic origin story for these strange blobs: they are artefacts of a gargantuan collision 4.5 billion years ago between early Earth and another young planet — the same collision thought to have formed the Moon. The modelling suggests that this violent encounter caused material from the impacting world, called Theia, to embed itself in the lower half of Earth’s mantle. The collision also caused some of Theia’s remnants to be flung into orbit; these eventually coalesced into the Moon.

The idea that the mantle anomalies are remnants of Theia is not new, says Robin Canup, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado. “But this paper is the first in my mind to really take that notion seriously,” she says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study appears today in Nature.

Cosmic collision

A giant collision between the young Earth and a smaller protoplanet has long been the prevailing theory for the Moon’s formation. Such an origin would explain features such as the Moon’s lack of many volatile compounds, which would have been vapourized during the collision with Earth.

Such an enormous impact early in Earth’s development should have left some traces. Yuan and his colleagues wondered whether those traces might include the strange regions in Earth’s mantle — the layer between the crust and the core. Scientists call these formations large low-velocity provinces, because seismic waves travel more slowly through them than they do through the rest of the mantle.

The researchers ran computer simulations of the interaction between Theia’s mantle and that of Earth from the moment of the collision to the present. This showed that some material from Theia initially sank to the bottom portion of Earth’s mantle and that more of Theia piled up there over time, forming the blobs. The authors reported these results at a planetary-science meeting in 2021.

For their latest work, the authors expanded their models. They found that the energy of the planetary smash-up would have partially melted Earth’s mantle, which would then have had two layers: a molten top and a mostly solid bottom.

The upper, molten layer would have swirled some Theia material into Earth material. But other Theia material would have sunk through the molten portion of the mantle and lodged itself in the bottom layer. Eventually it would have formed two separate blobs. Meanwhile, other Theia material was launched into orbit and formed the Moon.

Comparing mantle and Moon

The model isn’t a smoking gun that the mantle anomalies are remnants of Theia, but Yuan and his colleagues have “made a case that [the scenario] can be taken seriously,” Canup says. “It’s not just a throwaway idea, which is kind of what I think [it] was before this work.” The next step will be validating the models by comparing rock samples from the mantle with some from the Moon.

Maxim Ballmer, a geodynamicist at University College London, is not sure that this idea for the mantle anomalies will hold up. The model “definitely needs to be tested,” Ballmer says. “But I do think that it’s an idea worth pursuing.”

Yuan hopes that this and subsequent research could shed light on what has made Earth so unique — factors that might include the collision with Theia. This study, he says, suggests that “this giant impact [created] some heterogeneities in the Earth that can last for billions of years.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on November 1, 2023.

Anil Oza is a Boston-based science journalist focused on health inequity and neuroscience.

More by Anil Oza

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe